Crossing the line: has the democratic party gone over the edge this time? Passed the point of no return? *comprehensive assessment*

Have the actions of the democratic party in recent months doomed its future as a political party?

  • No, the Democratic party is resilient and will bounce back and will remain a solid contender

  • Yes, the Democratic party has commited unpardonable sins and lost total public confidence

  • The Democratic party will evolve into and submit to the wants and needs of the globalists

  • The treasonous actions of the democratic party will trigger the downfall of America

  • The democratic party has accomplished nothing for the nation since its inception. Good riddence

  • The democratic party needs to be removed from all positions of power based on clear warnings

  • The articles of Impeachment will NEVER move to the senate, inciting a civil war

  • The democratic party will flounder and sink before the 2020 election

  • Conspiracy theory: The UN will soon nominate Obama to hold a position of considerable power

  • Conspiracy theory: We are living in the end times and very close to the start of the tribulation


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nov 2019
651
68
Upstate NY
We have top democrats in profound rebellion against the authority of the constitution.

How are we supposed to deal with the speakers' decision to withhold the articles of impeachment? And for that matter, we can add the entire house impeachment inquiry as a treasonous act from start to present. Ergo, all the democrats who supported this inquiry hoax, should be held accountable due to guilt by association.

You know these liberals are consistently lying behind your back, two faced, and that's the mark of a coward.
I want to also look at the hypothetical end game here for America. We are at risk and I harbor serious concerns about the fate of America.

We need something big to prevent the incoming wave of violence and I'd like to see how the voting breaks down, so it would be nice to get a conversation going.

Old example, but --- how can we reconcile the fact that Christopher Stevens is dead because the democrats failed to provide adequate security? Ignoring the demands of an American Patriot and servicemen and failing to protect our Embassy on a known, highly toxic and deadly date (9/11) in which many more attacks are carried out in remembrance of the Radical Islamic Terrorists on 9/11/2001 clear cut treason.

So boom, in that little tweet we have the speaker of the House, the most powerful democrat in the nation committing clear treason by holding the articles of Impeachment. We can also add Hillary and Obama to that list.

In essence, I think we are seeing a major weakening of constitution rule right before our very eyes. Trump's saved us from Hillary but he cannot save us from the new world order.

So my point is we are seeing an evolution of lawlessness that has definitely picked up steam in the past few months. I am asking if the democrats have gone to far this time - and hypothetically they would they be able to recover from the treasonous moves they have made in the past few weeks?

Or are withholding the articles of impeachment a calculated, premeditated move to set up the looming civil war?
 
Nov 2013
2,910
1,344
NM
...

Old example, but --- how can we reconcile the fact that Christopher Stevens is dead because the democrats failed to provide adequate security? Ignoring the demands of an American Patriot and servicemen and failing to protect our Embassy on a known, highly toxic and deadly date (9/11) in which many more attacks are carried out in remembrance of the Radical Islamic Terrorists on 9/11/2001 clear cut treason.

...
Please try to keep the facts straight. Yes, Stevens was the US ambassador to Libya. No, the US embassy isn't in Benghazi, that was a consulate. The US embassy, TMK, is still in Tripoli, the capital, the normal location.
 
Apr 2015
2,301
2,700
Stockport, Cheshire. UK
Where is the ‘comprehensive assessment’ ?
What you have actually provided is a biased political rant where you claim, amongst other things, the impeachment process against Trump is a treasonous act, when in fact it is a legitimate process fully in accord with the US Constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwII and Clara007
Nov 2012
11,336
9,726
nirvana
Please try to keep the facts straight. Yes, Stevens was the US ambassador to Libya. No, the US embassy isn't in Benghazi, that was a consulate. The US embassy, TMK, is still in Tripoli, the capital, the normal location.
What I find amazing at this point is they keep posting shit like this, while they keep losing on every issue, and every election since dotard was appointed by a handfull of electors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clara007
Dec 2015
20,189
20,617
Arizona
Dear AutoCorrect,
In cases like this post, it's NEVER *EVER*.......DUCK.
Love, Clara xo
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNG
Jun 2018
7,351
1,735
South Dakota
Where is the ‘comprehensive assessment’ ?
What you have actually provided is a biased political rant where you claim, amongst other things, the impeachment process against Trump is a treasonous act, when in fact it is a legitimate process fully in accord with the US Constitution.
It's a legitimate process in accordance with the constitution, is what has happened in every banana republic that's seen a tin pot dictator use the courts and constitution to wrest total control of a country and make the current govt a Dictator for life. We have what amounts to a coup here and now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: se7en
Apr 2015
2,301
2,700
Stockport, Cheshire. UK
It's a legitimate process in accordance with the constitution, is what has happened in every banana republic that's seen a tin pot dictator use the courts and constitution to wrest total control of a country and make the current govt a Dictator for life. We have what amounts to a coup here and now.
Your reply is pure unadulterated drivel, with a complete lack of honesty or integrity to it.
There is not the slightest evidence that this is an attempt to overthrow the democratic process in the USA, in fact the evidence all points to it being an attempt to protect the democratic process, by acting in a totally legitimate manner against a president who has shown himself willing to abuse the power of his office in order to benefit himself personally by forcing a foreign government with the use of bribery to interfere in US domestic politics.