david david

Dec 2018
Tell me..

Do you consider yourself 'wise'?

How much monies do you think this is, approximately? To the nearest 50 or 100.

How much is a brand new 'car' nowdays? Or an apartment complex? What are the real estate prices? Can I purchase the land and develop on it, please?

the answer is:

2 Peter 2:10-11 "...they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. 11Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord."

And so we learn that we should not speak against dignities. But what about the 'passing' of fake bills? Surely, they have a desire and will to stop counterfeits, right? They must. They are ordained of God.

Romans 13:1 For there is no power but of God: the powers that be - are ordained of God.

The 'powers' of the U.S. The 'powers' of Russia. The 'powers' of China. The 'powers' of Japan. All 'powers', Government, that are, are ordained of God.

Romans 13:4 "... if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil."

Do not: change the truth of God into a lie. (Romans 1:25)

Romans 13:1 "For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God."

Each 'government' has their own rules and laws. Not all the 'governments' have the same rules and laws but to abide by those rules and laws if and while living under their Government given 'rights' and while using that Government's 'legal tender', is what Romans 13 is speaking about.

I cannot 'transact' with U.S currency in China nor can the Chinese currency be 'used' in the U.S without the currency first needing to be 'exchanged' for the proper Country currency. But 'proper', as can be seen, is not always 'legal'.

There is 'prop', very close to being 'prop'er, monies but not 'legal tender'.

Last edited:
Dec 2018
I wonder.. If Hollywood had reluctance in 'getting right' with 'Right' could it have something to do with the 'adult film industry' which is very similar and maybe even 'joined' in some way?

Strange though. Because even the 'adult film industry' has rules and laws they need and are required to 'follow and adhere' to in order to keep in business. So why would a 'legal' business following the legal rules and laws feel as if they should have fear for doing some kind of 'wrong'? They wouldn't.

But the lacking 'necessity(ies)' of age verification(s) online could be a reason for trepidation on some parts.

In 2010, out of the million most popular (most trafficked) websites in the world, 42,337 were sex-related sites. That's about 4% of sites.

● From July 2009 to July 2010, about 13% of Web searches were for erotic content.

How Much of the Internet is Actually for Porn

4% of 1 million is 40,000 individual sites.

And how many of these 40,000 sites requires some kind of 'age verification'?

It sounds as if 40,000 individual and separate sites is not that many. But if you can guess-timate on the number of different, individual separate sites you've visited in the past 5 years, how many would you think you visited? Separate, individual, different sites?

There are the few 'news' sites, the 'business sites', the 'tech' sites, the social media sites... Let's assume 15 for each.. 15 different, separate sites for news, 15 different, separate sites for business, 15 different, separate sites for 'tech', 15 different, separate sites for social media. That would make 60 different, separate sites which would be 'most familiar', 'most frequented'. That leaves thousands, tens of thousands not visited yet.

Oh, not to forget the 15 different, separate online shopping sites. Which would still leave thousands, tens of thousands still not visited yet.

So 40,000 different, separate sites are alot of different sites for the 'average' age group to have 'basis' with on their 'most familiar', 'most frequented' list(s).

I don't think that there are 40,000 different, separate, individual 'businesses' in any given City, small or large.

San Francisco, CA Yellow Pages

San Francisco/Population

884,363 (2017)

But then, I could be off by some hundreds or maybe even thousands.

A group of 100 is 100.

A group of 100 and with 5 groups of 100 each with and of different independent separate persons is 500.

A group of 100 and with 10 groups of 100 each and with and of different independent separate persons is 1000.

1000 and 40,000 .. the difference is 39,000

San Francisco County/city, CA Unemployment Rate:
2.20% for Nov 2018

San Francisco County/city, CA Unemployment Rate

The unemployment rate is a measure of the prevalence of unemployment and it is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force.

Unemployment - Wikipedia

la·bor force


  1. all the members of a particular organization or population who are able to work, viewed collectively.
Leaving 97.80% of the 67.2% in the labor force 'employed'. 594,291.9
581,217.5 (employed)

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: San Francisco city, California; UNITED STATES

And with 40,000 businesses, that would mean 1 out of 14.5 individual(s) in the 'employed', has their, separate, personal, own, business.

With all the 'rumors' of 'homelessness' in San Francisco, it's hard to imagine the unemployed rate at 2.20% of the 'labor force'. Or, 12,004.69 individuals between the ages of 18 and 65.
Last edited:
Dec 2018
So the question is: Are the states in the U.S doing well and doing well in the 'Right and Just' for the sake of the resident 'neighbors'?

Otherwise known, majoratively as, 'the tax payers'.

Tax payers' age group: 18-65.

Birth years for ages 18 and 65: 2001 and 1954

Average age, or lowest age (?), of first time home ownership: 32 : Birth year; 1987

The age of first-time home buyers was ... 31 in 2013.

Median Age of Home Buyers Trending Upward

If 31 is the median, what are the end points with +/- 7 differential?

24 and 38. Which means that in 2013, 24 year olds as well as 38 year olds were purchasing their first home and the median age was 31.
Last edited:
Dec 2018
Today's concept of 'love' is really baffling and often times stifling. I feel as if I should know what this 'love' is and that I should live out this 'love' in everyday life towards strangers, both good and bad, when my own family is not even being as 'loved' as those that are out in public are, it seems.

How this is a Christ like 'love', I do not know nor understand. As far as what i hear from Church(s).... 'do good', 'be in a good relationship with The LORD God (J)esus Christ'. Amen and Amen.

Church is not supposed to get involved in and with Political matters anyhows.. It goes against a certain thing. And so.. 'do good'... 'be in a good relationship with The LORD and God and (J)esus Christ'. Amen and Amen.

Church is not supposed to... not individuals..

Some on the 'streets' like to call this 'Organized religions'.

I haven't looked into this but is JW, Jehovah's Witnesses, also part of Mr. Lyndon B. Johnson's 501c3 'thing'? In other words, what defines the word 'Church' to the Government?

A nonprofit organization (NPO), also known as a non-business entity[1], not-for-profit organization[2], or nonprofit institution,[3] is dedicated to furthering a particular social cause or advocating for a shared point of view. In economic terms, it is an organization that uses its surplus of the revenues to further achieve its ultimate objective, rather than distributing its income to the organization's shareholders, leaders, or members. Nonprofits are tax exempt or charitable, meaning they do not pay income tax on the money that they receive for their organization. They can operate in religious, scientific, research, or educational settings.

Nonprofit organization - Wikipedia

Back in the day(s), there were small Community Churches which had its members be more as 'family' than 'attendees' to which these 'surplus of revenues' were used for the continuation and maintenance and 'growth', or to say, to and for their 'Church'. A 'body of believers' who 'shared' in the Church's 'burdens', including building finances. Although that Church could be part of the larger Denomination with its Conference 'heads', it was still their Church to which they kept and maintained through their own desires and contributions; out of 'keeping' rather than 'obeying'.

How the 'conference' delegates its surplus of revenues might be what the NPO or whichever is referring to... I don't know..

A story:

There was a man named John and he belonged to a certain 'sect'. Upon the sect growing and becoming larger in space and finances, many entered in and was 'joyful' that they were part of that 'sect'. Soon, however, some faced hardships with their own finances. Upon asking John for assistance to their financial burden, they were referred to another part of the 'sect'. So these members who were with the 'sect' for over 10 years now went to that 'section' of the sect and asked the 'heads' there if they could receive assistance to their financial burden. The 'heads' agreed but upon their leaving that 'section' with the helps they asked for, they were told quietly to not let this 'matter' get too spoken about.

As they reentered the 'sect' with their financial hardships being removed, some of the other members they acquainted with also shared how they were in financial 'hardships'. The 2 looked at each other and prayed they would get assistance. These persons who were faced with their financial hardship was not told of the 'other section' of the sect and so they put their minds together. And with their time(s) and energies spent with each other and with The Lord being involved in the 'resolution', they also ended up with having their financial hardships removed. Not only that but an increase came their way to which they went back to the 'sect' to share with the others.

Well, it could have been financial or others, but this occurred with (J)ohn the Baptist and Christ.
Last edited: