Do Not Shout ‘Impeach’ When There Is No Fire

May 2018
East Coast Of U.S.A.
House Judiciary Committee's top Democrat spends train ride talking on the phone about investigating and impeaching BOTH Trump and Kavanaugh – and a reporter in the same car overhears it all​
By David Martosko​
Published: 19:48 EST, 7 November 2018 | Updated: 22:54 EST, 7 November 2018​

McConnell’s puzzle ain’t Rubik’s Cube:

"Schumer may have an attendance problem as he looks around to see who's in town when they're not in Iowa and New Hampshire, and we do apparently have a lot of Democratic presidential wannabes here in the Senate," McConnell said during an interview on Fox News. "It'll be interesting to see what they're up to."

McConnell: ‘We Have a Lot of Democratic Presidential Wannabes Here in the Senate’​
BY: Jeffrey Cimmino​
November 7, 2018 7:29 pm​
Returning to the golden years of U.S. Senators controlling the government is what the wannabes are up to.

In 2008 the mainstream media (MSM) was determined to put a sitting U.S. Senator in the White House in an attempt to reverse the public’s low opinion of the Senate. Sitting Senator Barack Obama’s win gave the country government by senators. Two were long-serving senators; Joe Biden and John Kerry.

Sitting Senator Hillary Clinton followed the traitor John Kerry at State.

Joe Biden’s sock puppet, former Senator Chuck Hagel, was Secretary of Defense from 2013 to 2015.

In short: The years between 2009 and 2013 were the golden years for Democrats. In 2012 no Senator ran against the Chicago sewer rat:

For the first time since 1900, no sitting U.S. senator on either side of the aisle is running or considering a run for president, at least yet.​

2012 field making history already​
By: CNN Political Unit​
May 27th, 2011​
Lets face it, media kingmakers did not want the public reminded of the MSM’s agenda in 2008.

NOTE: The U.S. Senate has been the global government crowd’s most powerful weapon in their war against the country. For starters, it was the Senate that ratified U.S. membership in the United Nations. Beginning with the XVII Amendment in 1913, the Senate’s influence grew and grew until it reached a new high in 2008.

The United States Constitution requires that most senior federal officers must be confirmed by the Senate before assuming office. Included are appointments for positions throughout the federal government, for the Cabinet and subcabinet, for members of regulatory commissions, for ambassadorships, for judgeships, and for members of numerous advisory boards.​

Obama’s senators were as much responsible for czars and czarinas as was Obama for appointing them. I firmly believe that Obama, Biden, Kerry, and Clinton, cleared every unconstitutional appointment with their former RINO colleagues in a Democrat-controlled Senate. By giving unconstitutional appointees authority under the table so to speak, Senate Democrats, and a few RINO, kept their skirts clean by not having to openly vote to confirm some of the foulest people Obama brought into government.

If you read the linked article you will see this:

During the final maneuvering of Congress to fund the government for 2011, the House of Representatives attached a rider to HR 1473, the Full Year Continuing Resolution Act of 2011, that specifically denied funding for several of President Obama's "czars."​

Does the phrase “Too little too late.” ring a bell? In any event Obama signed the bill —— sort of:

Nevertheless, President Obama decided to create his own personal version of a line item veto, by signing the legislation while using a "signing statement," in which he declared his intent to violate the law that he was signing:​
No one can convince me that the House and Senate engaging in their beloved bipartisanship could not rein in presidential power in that important area. They sure know how to work together when it came to sticking it to the public in everything else.

The following excerpt offered a pleasant possibility albeit unrealistic:

The Republican leaders of the House of Representatives should strongly consider immediately taking action to impeach the unconstitutionally appointed and unlawfully maintained positions of the Czars of Obama.
June 3, 2011​
Impeach the Czars!​
By Wesley Clark, MD​

There was not a snowball’s chance in hell Senate RINO would go along with diminishing Obama’s power. It is absurd to think that Senators would eliminate a practice that gave their betrayals so much cover. The fact is: Senate Democrats led by then-Senator Harry Reid stood foursquare behind Obama’s czars —— not only support, but the concept of unconstitutional czars. By doing nothing about it since then the door remains wide open for future Democrat presidents, and future Democrat-controlled Senates. That is what McConnell should fear.

Finally, Democrats in the House were not shouting ‘Impeach everyone in sight’ back in 2011.
Last edited:
May 2018
East Coast Of U.S.A.
Finally, Democrats in the House were not shouting ‘Impeach everyone in sight’ back in 2011.
It all comes down to who do you believe? A lying Democrat in the party of liars?

Rep. Nadler​

or a FOX contributor who has never been caught lying?

Mollie Hemingway​

Nadler reportedly was on his way to a two-day planning session with staff members and such.​
“We’ve got to figure out what we’re doing,” he said at one point.​
Democrat Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who’s the top of his party in the House Judiciary Committee, was caught by a reporter on Wednesday strategizing to impeach Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.​
In public.​
On the Acela train.​
It was Mollie Hemingway of the Federalist who wrote about the encounter.​
The plans, she revealed, are for the Democrat to impeach Kavanaugh for “perjury.”​
Nadler, a New York Democrat, also plans to investigate and impeach President Trump for alleged treasonous collusion with Russia,using his party’s new majority in the House.​
“In post-election chats with various callers while riding the Acela train from New York to Washington, Nadler gave advice to a newly elected representative and discussed potential 2020 Democratic presidential nominees with another. He also lamented identity politics and the thriving economy and worried about Democrats losing working-class voters while gaining elite former Republicans and suburban women,” the report said.​
The conversation was about “two routes for investigating new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. The first is to go after the FBI for how they handled the investigation into unsubstantiated claims he sexually assaulted women. ‘They didn’t even do a half-a– job,’ he said. ‘They didn’t interview 30 witnesses who said ‘Interview me! I’ve got a lot to say!” he said, while mimicking people waving their hands to be called on.”​
The other route is to claim perjury.​
“He claimed that The Atlantic published an article about the allegations of a third woman. Then he claimed that when Kavanaugh was ‘asked at a committee hearing under oath’ when he first heard of the subject, he said, ‘When I’d heard of the Atlantic article.’ But there is an email chain apparently dating from well before that from him about ‘How can we deal with this?” Nadler told the caller.”​
Hemingway explained Nadler apparently was mixed up, discussing a different claim, since debunked, which was that Kavanaugh “perjured himself when he denied hearing of the New Yorker’s disputed allegation involving Deborah Ramirez until the story came out.”​
She explained, “Considering that the New Yorker included a denial from Kavanaugh in its own controversial story, and was asking him about it right before publication, and he acknowledged all that in his Senate testimony, it’s unclear how fruitful such a perjury claim would be,” the report said.​
Nadler admitted his plan may not be great, since he pointed out that even if Democrats succeed in removing Kavanaugh, President Trump could appoint “someone just as bad.”​
But Nadler said the fight will be open.​
“You can’t do it quietly because word will get out that the FBI or the committee is reaching out to witnesses.”​
Nadler also said “Russia” investigations would be under a category of holding the president accountable.​
He’s still depending on special counsel Robert Mueller, who’s been trying for nearly two years to find such evidence.​
The Daily Caller reported, “Nadler’s communications director Daniel Schwarz claimed Hemingway’s story was ‘an absolutely false and deliberately inaccurate report,’ in an emailed statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation.”
But the publication pointed out Shwarz did not return a follow-up inquiry asking him to point to specific quotations or passages in Hemingway’s report that he thought were inaccurate.
Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said he believes Nadler wanted to be heard.​
“Have you ever been on a plane or a train and somebody thinks they’re really hot stuff and they start being very, very loud about who they’re talking to? That’s supposed to impress you — or what they’re saying? That’s supposed to impress you. Who they are is supposed to impress you. That’s what he was doing. We all are irritated by people like that. These are basically insecure people who want to be stars, want to be thought of as recognizable stars. So he’s out there, he’s making it plain as day who he is, and he’s not trying to hide anything. He wants to be overheard.”​

Nadler strategizes for Kavanaugh impeachment, in public!​
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 11/08/2018 @ 4:28 pm​