Don't Tell Anyone, But We Just Had Two Years Of Record-Breaking Global Cooling

[ptif219]

Imagine that. We get another doom and gloom from the government report while we are in a cooling period.
Notice you hear nothing about this from the liberal media

https://www.investors.com/politics/...ange-global-warming-earth-cooling-media-bias/

NASA data show that global temperatures dropped sharply over the past two years. Not that you'd know it, since that wasn't deemed news. Does that make NASA a global warming denier?

Writing in Real Clear Markets, Aaron Brown looked at the official NASA global temperature data and noticed something surprising. From February 2016 to February 2018, "global average temperatures dropped by 0.56 degrees Celsius." That, he notes, is the biggest two-year drop in the past century.
"The 2016-2018 Big Chill," he writes, "was composed of two Little Chills, the biggest five month drop ever (February to June 2016) and the fourth biggest (February to June 2017). A similar event from February to June 2018 would bring global average temperatures below the 1980s average."
Isn't this just the sort of man-bites-dog story that the mainstream media always says is newsworthy?
In this case, it didn't warrant any news coverage.
In fact, in the three weeks since Real Clear Markets ran Brown's story, no other news outlet picked up on it. They did, however, find time to report on such things as tourism's impact on climate change, how global warming will generate more hurricanes this year, and threaten fish habitats, and make islands uninhabitable. They wrote about a UN official saying that "our window of time for addressing climate change is closing very quickly."

 

[baloney_detector]

 

[bill sands]

fake news

 

[bill sands]

The most likely explanation for the lack of significant warming at the Earth’s surface in the past decade or so is that natural climate cycles—a series of La Niña events and a negative phase of the lesser-known Pacific Decadal Oscillation—caused shifts in ocean circulation patterns that moved some excess heat into the deep ocean. Even so, recent years have been some of the warmest on record, and scientists expect temperatures will swing back up soon.

Why did Earth’s surface temperature stop rising in the past decade? | NOAA Climate.gov

 

[bill sands]

two years? two years is hardly an observable trend this is what happens when non scientiests talk about things thatey dont unerstand

 

[bill sands]

Why did Earth’s surface temperature stop rising in the past decade? | NOAA Climate.gov

The long-term trend—change over the course of a century or more—is what defines “global warming,” not the change from year to year or even decade to decade. Rising emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution explain most of the overall warming trend over the past century, and the rate of emissions has not slowed significantly in the recent past. So what else has been going on in the climate system over the past decade that could account for the pause in Earth’s surface warming trend?

During the last decade, a longer than usual solar minimum cycle, several volcanic eruptions, and relatively low amounts of water vapor in the stratosphere may have helped cool the atmosphere temporarily. But recent research suggests that the Earth’s natural climate variability—natural, short-term fluctuations in the climate system that occur on a year-to-year basis or longer—may have played the most pivotal role of all by transferring excess heat from the Earth’s surface into the deep ocean.

One of the most well-known natural climate oscillations—the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle—causes swings in sea surface temperatures in the tropical Pacific. Although ENSO originates in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, a strong El Niño or La Niña event is capable of bumping global temperatures upward or downward for a year or two. Since the last major El Niño event in 1997-1998, a series of La Niña events have dominated the tropical Pacific, resulting in a prolonged cooling of sea surface temperatures that has also likely stalled the rise in global temperatures.

 

[RNG]

The OP is total junk, not surprisingly. If you look at the link inside the link inside the OP link you see some NASA data.

All the NASA data shows strong warming all through this two year period.

Here it is. There should be a law. Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP)

 

[ptif219]

The OP is total junk, not surprisingly. If you look at the link inside the link inside the OP link you see some NASA data.

All the NASA data shows strong warming all through this two year period.

Here it is. There should be a law. Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP)

As always you spew garbage

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eres-why-thats-normal/?utm_term=.6b10fe310e19

Mainstream Media Completely Ignores Global-cooling Data

 

[RNG]

As always you spew garbage

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eres-why-thats-normal/?utm_term=.6b10fe310e19

Mainstream Media Completely Ignores Global-cooling Data

No, it is your ignorance and adherence to the stupidity spewing from Dotard's mouth. From the link bill sands gave:

Did global warming stop in 1998?

No, but thanks to natural variability, volcanic eruptions, and relatively low solar activity, the rate of average global surface warming from 1998-2012 was slower than it had been for two to three decades leading up to it.

How much slower depends on the fine print: which global temperature dataset you look at, whether it includes the Arctic, and the exact time periods you compare. Regardless, the big picture of long-term global warming remained unchanged.

It's called cherry-picking data.

Did global warming stop in 1998? | NOAA Climate.gov

 

[Clara007]

Investors Business Daily: Founded in 1984 by entrepreneur and stockbroker William O’Neil, Investors Business Daily (IBD) is a conservative American newspaper and website covering the stock market, international business, finance and economics. In March, 2016, IBD became a weekly publication that focuses more on digital operations. The publication continues to use the Investor’s Business Daily name as it continues to publish daily on its website. Although IBD mostly reports on economics and finance they also allow lobbyists and PR reps for right-wing think tanks like the Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute to write pseudo-scientific propaganda.

Probably another Koch-funded rag.