Establishment Democrats Are Undermining Medicare for All

Sep 2019
1,888
810
Here
Imagine that. Establishment democrats? How can that even be possible<<< Sarcasm

Establishment Democrats Are Undermining Medicare for All
he Democratic establishment — deep in the pockets of the health industry — wanted to make sure any blue wave election in 2018 would help sink, rather than support, the growing movement for a single-payer health care system. The recent decline in co-sponsors of the House Medicare for All legislation is, in part, a byproduct of this strategy and a reminder of the great obstacles corporate Democrats have put in front of the single-payer movement.
In 2018, there were 124 cosponsors for the Medicare for All bill in the House (then H.R. 676), representing 66 percent of the Democratic Caucus. This was celebrated widely as a high-water mark for the legislation. So was the release of
 
Feb 2018
1,128
615
Oregon
Don't you agree, however, that SOMETHING has to be done to fix it after private industry has given us this mess?
 
Sep 2019
1,888
810
Here
Don't you agree, however, that SOMETHING has to be done to fix it after private industry has given us this mess?
Something needs to be done to rid the country of health insurance companies. I just don't think this government should. The democrat establishment (people like Klinton and Warren) will support picking winners and losers in the deal. Private company contracts will be chosen, and they'll get filthy rich off the deal.
Just like military contractors (like Lockhead/Martin, Haliburton etc etc) are chosen. And they get filthy rich in the process.
Which is something the commi's are all against, but never realize just how much money they make off of tax payer funded government contracts.

$313M Medicare administration contract goes to Noridian
 
Jul 2019
6,652
3,670
Georgia
wait so if Warren is an establishment dem....
and establishment dems are undermining medicare for all...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
why does warren have a m4a plan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: leekohler2
Sep 2019
1,888
810
Here
Another medicare contractor. This one is how they rip off doctors, to save their money. Not the tax payers. Good read, if you're against corruption and greed. But if you're a commi apologist, you might not wanna click on this link.

Problem Pile-Up
 
Sep 2019
1,888
810
Here
wait so if Warren is an establishment dem....
and establishment dems are undermining medicare for all...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
why does warren have a m4a plan?
Maybe she's got friends or stock in one (or more) of those medicare contractors.

Try answering your own questions about this, instead of blindly following establishment politicians because they sound good.
 
Jul 2019
6,652
3,670
Georgia
Maybe she's got friends or stock in one (or more) of those medicare contractors.

Try answering your own questions about this, instead of blindly following establishment politicians because they sound good.
good guess (I guess), (not really)
but do you have any links showing that her plan will use said companies as contractors?

I'm looking but not finding anything.
 
Sep 2019
1,888
810
Here
good guess (I guess),
but do you have any links showing that her plan will incorporate private companies as contractors?

I'm looking but not finding anything.
You're not finding it because she's not elected yet. But there are established medicare contractors already. Which will probably get billions (of tax payer dollars) for handling a MFA contract.

Remember Bush pushing for SS contributions to be put into the stock market? This is on the same level, dude. Huge contracts means less money for medicare recipients. It means higher taxes for those same medicare recipients.

And your reply is "good?" Holy hell man.
 
Jul 2019
6,652
3,670
Georgia
You're not finding it because she's not elected yet. But there are established medicare contractors already. Which will probably get billions (of tax payer dollars) for handling a MFA contract.

Remember Bush pushing for SS contributions to be put into the stock market? This is on the same level, dude. Huge contracts means less money for medicare recipients. It means higher taxes for those same medicare recipients.

And your reply is "good?" Holy hell man.
so make up your mind, because your OP states that establishment dems are undermining M4A
the article even notes Sanders's M4A bill, of which Warren is a co-sponsor
but then you called Liz an establishment Dem, which completely conflicts with your OP

Is she only an establishment Dem when you see fit, or were you just trying to sneak in an uninformed jab?