Green New Deal is a disaster-in-waiting

Sep 2015
13,459
4,930
Brown Township, Ohio
#62
Nice rebuttal.

No reason to retype something that already exists in this very thread.
Jimmyb is the only constitutional scholar on DTT. Many people say things twice to emphasize including myself. edit: Lapo Lapo means big fish.
 
Last edited:
Feb 2007
5,079
2,769
USA
#64
It is on page 15 as I posted.
No, you are quite mistaken. Page 15 of that Lazard study details how the cost of carbon abatement comparisons between different renewable energy and conventional energy terminologies were calculated, of which the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for said technologies was used as a factor in that calculation. But page 15 does not detail how the LCOE was calculated. Rather, the details of how the LCOE was calculated for said technologies is shown on page 13 of the Lazard study. And, once again, the so-called "cost of carbon abatement" wasn't utilized as a factor, whatsoever, in those LCOE calculations. And, again, this chart summarizes the results of those LCOE calculations.:



:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Likes: imaginethat
Jun 2013
5,562
1,716
Katmandu
#65
No, you are quite mistaken. Page 15 of that Lazard study details how the cost of carbon abatement comparisons between different renewable energy and conventional energy terminologies were calculated, of which the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for said technologies was used as a factor in that calculation. But page 15 does not detail how the LCOE was calculated. Rather, the details of how the LCOE was calculated for said technologies is shown on page 13 of the Lazard study. And, once again, the so-called "cost of carbon abatement" wasn't utilized as a factor, whatsoever, in those LCOE calculations. And, again, this chart summarizes the results of those LCOE calculations.:



:rolleyes:
The levelized cost is just a made up penalty to make conventional fuels look more expensive than they actually are.
 
Dec 2016
4,411
2,282
Canada
#69
And the relevance of posting this pic what be, what, exactly?
I can think of two things! First, since it took you three full days to respond, that indicates to me that you're one of these busy evangelicals who monitor and look for opportunities to insert their religious credos and dogmas as far and wide as possible, but don't really participate in any one forum or social media group. So, thanks for keeping us posted on how the Church of Neoliberal Capitalism interprets the real world, AND
that dickhead clapping for you is a benefactor of your dogma though not an actual theorist who created the religion that permeates global trade and finance, as well as the schools that teach or brainwash new generations of economists to go out into the world and call for greater austerity measures on social spending, reduced taxes on the rich, and deregulation of business, industry and finance, so that the term - 'white collar crime' is now a thing of the past!
And the sociopath creeps like Bezos...who think we should all be worried about HIS privacy and HIS alone, owe it all to the watercarriers like you who are willing to sacrifice the future of the planet so that the aristocrats can keep accumulating more and more and increase their power over the political establishment!