Human Baby Butchers Show Less Humanity Than Whales

May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
Planned Parenthood is probably looking into selling mammal baby parts.


The newborn killer whale calf died shortly after birth, but days later, its mother was still holding on. USA TODAY

An endangered orca whale died shortly after its birth on Tuesday, and the calf's mother has been tending to the body for three days.

The calf was born near near Victoria, British Columbia, located about 75 miles northwest of Seattle. Researchers working to track Southern Resident killer whales responded to the scene, the Center for Whale Research said in a release.

The organization observed the baby's corpse sinking and the mother repeatedly bringing it back to the surface on Tuesday. The mother supported her offspring's body on her forehead as she pushed it toward an island, the organization said.

On Thursday, the mother – labeled J35 – entered her third day of mourning with her calf, Ken Balcomb, founder and principal investigator of the Center for Whale Research, told USA TODAY.

"It's still happening," he said Thursday evening. He said that he has observed the behavior before, but not for this length of time.

The organization says killer whales and dolphins show strong mother-offspring bonds and sometimes transport dead calves for up to a week.​

Orca mom mourns calf's death by carrying the body for days
Joel Shannon,
Published 10:37 p.m. ET July 26, 2018 | Updated 10:50 a.m. ET July 27, 2018

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/07/26/orca-mom-mourns-calfs-death-carrying-body-days/846285002/
 

RNG

Apr 2013
38,656
26,645
La La Land North
Yeah, cheer on wasting badly needed resources on a dead object.

Fool.
 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
Yeah, cheer on wasting badly needed resources on a dead object.
To RNG: Presumably, parasite programs badly need those resources. In your sick world “resources” is doublespeak for tax dollars; i.e. tax dollars butchering infants for their organs.

To RNG: Asshole. On the day Socialist/Communist freaks discovered that killing with kindness justified their Culture of Death killing the elderly and the infirm became an act of compassion. Slaughtering tens of millions of infants (hundreds of millions worldwide) has become doing a kindness for mothers.
 
May 2018
4,448
3,420
USA
Isn't it amazing how the RW has no shame, whatsoever, about repeating debunked lies, over and over? Why is that, do you think? Because their actual ideas have so little merit that they aren't worth talking about?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
Isn't it amazing how the RW has no shame, whatsoever, about repeating debunked lies, over and over? Why is that, do you think? Because their actual ideas have so little merit that they aren't worth talking about?
To GluteusMaximus: It is amazing how the LW has no shame, whatsoever, about repeating debunked lies, over and over? Why is that, do you think? Because their actual ideas have so little merit that they are ashamed to openly defend slaughtering children so they lie?

His pursuit of the pro-choice voter is so assiduous as to bring into question his intellectual sanity. John Kerry is a Catholic who, he frequently says, opposes abortion but is in favor of the rights of dissenters from his position to have abortions and to advocate a higher incidence of them. That position by Catholic politicians ("I am personally opposed to it, but others aren't, and I respect their rights to their positions") is hardly novel. Teddy Kennedy and Mario Cuomo come to mind, famous expositors of the imputed obligation to transcend private opinions in the service of public consensus.

But Kerry has gone what in better days would have been universally held to be one bridge too far. In a speech last year to the NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, he gave an intellectually suicidal summary of his views.

He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.

Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world."

This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.

But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."

But Kerry says he personally opposes abortion. Where is he exhibiting his pride in what he stands for? Whom has he counseled against abortion? A nun somewhere, out of earshot?​

Crooked thought
William F. Buckley
February 26, 2004

http://townhall.com/columnists/williamfbuckley/2004/02/26/crooked_thought

http://defendingthetruth.com/abortion/93432-60-000-000-counting.html#post1212607