Is it All that Difficult to Enter the Middle-Class or Above in the Current US System?

Is it All that Difficult to Enter the Middle-Class or Above in the Current US System?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • No

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Total voters
Dec 2017
Is it All that Difficult to Enter the Middle-Class or Above in the Current American System?

Regardless of race, gender, class background, family structure/background, ect. ect, is it all that difficult to enter the Middle-Class or above in the current American system. That is, is there any genuine need to live a life of poverty in America (for an extended period of time--on the scale of decades)?

Note: The Middle-Class in 2016 defined by Pew Research Center was those earning 67-200% of the median income (per household), or $39,560-$118,080.


Now, given our current system, everyone has enough opportunity to find a way to attend a College for an Engineering, Statistics, Computer Science, Business, ect. degree that would potentially set them up for at least decent to good paying jobs after graduation. Even a completely poor person has an opportunity for this since there are Government Stafford Loans that everyone qualifies for, regardless of credit history, no co-signer needed, and is enough to first attend a Community College plus apartment (if you work part-time also) and later to a State School program or even to a University of Florida type school (depending on the tuition of the big state school program in one's respective state). From there, PhD programs are free, in fact, they pay you a stipend to attend. This is enough to set someone up for life (if used wisely--and they can ultimately get into nearly any major University by Grad School regardless of what they are confined to/able to attend for Undergraduate degree). Here are important points to note about the University system in the US (in regards to this topic):

1. There is a clear hierarchy in Academia, and it is wise to understand the "Game" in order to best play it
2. No matter what your previous grades/schooling have been like, there are ways you can still get into virtually any level program for your Undergrad still (including the Elite level schools)
3. No matter what Undergrad program you go to, there are ways to go to virtually any Grad School Program
3. Even if your financial resources are limited, there are ways to get into good schools and be able to pay for it all the way up through PhD
4. The level of school you attend is going to greatly effect how difficult the courses are, and thus the GPA you will be able to get
a) Community College will be at a very reasonable level of difficulty as will a Public State School Program
b) A school around the 100-150 level (national rank) will definitely be noticeably more challenging than CC or State School (for the same program)
c) A school around the 50 level will be very challenging and completely different than CC or State School level
d) A school at the Elite level (roughly the top 20) would require one to be at an elite level for that stage in order to pass (top few% or so of people inclined for that technical subject at that level)
5. In the modern era, there are countless resources available that thoroughly teach any given technical subject area for free or a limited fee, and would prove to be an invaluable asset in learning said material (either for formal training/school or self-study).

Now, if a person's true interests lie in Art History however since they are coming from a poor economic background, one would have enough money (if used wisely) to first get a degree in a practical subject (e.g. Business, Engineering, ect.) that would set them up with a decent/good paying job which they could function as a stepping stone and safety net that allows them to go back to College for the subject matter they are truly interested in and pursue that career path henceforth.

This is to say, although the current system is far from optimal and certainly does not have "equality of opportunity" in a strict sense, there currently are ways to reach the highest level outcomes even from the bottom of US society for anyone. Now, Stafford Loans are flawed (in my view) since the amount of money you are eligible to receive is only compatible with a State-School of low college ranking (unless you happen to live in a state such as Florida where the major Public University were only about $7000 tuition per year). However, if Stafford Loans (Government Loans) were expanded to say the Graduate school level of $18,000-20,000 per year (rather than $12,000) than regardless of State one is in, family financial background, ect. ect., any person would be afforded "Equality of Opportunity" as it pertained to going to College as they would have the means to attend a Major University for their Undergrad which opens the door for the highest possibilities after that point (i.e. to follow ones intellectual interests as a career path and/or acquire the credentials needed to land a high paying job--depending on what the individual values more). Furthermore, Stafford Loans apply to Trade Schools as well. Therefore, any person who is savvy enough to play the "game" wisely could either (A) attain even the highest levels of education in Academia (B ) attend a Trade School & get solid job training to become an Electrician, Plumber, Carpenter, ect. ect. which typically is 1-2 year programs that cost between $1000-$10,000 total and sets them up with a job which on average earn about $50,000 a year (a solid income).
Now, one of the staples of America is (ostensibly) the open/fair opportunity for all citizens toward economic/class mobility (up & down the latter) based upon how savvy they are at "playing the game" as well as how hard they are willing to work for their "spot". Stafford Loans (as current) go a long way toward fulfilling that "staple social contract" of America & if it were expanded just a bit more than currently, then it would completely satisfy that "social contract". Also, this would eliminate all arguments to the contrary--as in, nobody would be able to claim that "the system is holding them down perpetually" as it would be overtly false. Note, this also wouldn't cost much more at all compared to now, as it is only a several thousand dollar extension that (very likely) most people would not be savvy enough to capitalize on anyway. Compare that to the "Free College" program promoted by the Social Dems. that would be mandated in tax dollars, regardless of who is or is not using the system (which would cost orders of magnitude more money to fund in tax-payers' dollars). This would actually objectively create quite a "fair" socio-economic system as everyone has equal access to this opportunity regardless of race/class/gender/family structure/ect. ect. & it would be up to them (the individual) to do with it what they will (Note: it already is like that--however, as I explained previously, simply expanding this ever so slightly more would make an enormous difference (for reasons I explained)).

Here is a link to the Stafford Loan program in the US:

Remember, the Classes are defined by a three-person household standard. That is, a married couple and child (or less--e.g. independent individual, ect.). Now, a household with one member that had a Trade degree (and corresponding Profession) as an Electrician, Plumber, Carpenter, ect. would make on average $50,000 and therefore would be part of the middle-class. If two members of the household had a similar background (or above), then they would be at the 6-figure income mark.

This begs the question, what keeps people in lifelong poverty? It is certainly understandable to go through significant rough-patches at a point or points (particularly & obviously when in their youth and still attempting to establish oneself, or being laid off from a job/position, and many other potential circumstances, ect. ect.). However, if one were approaching 40 years old for instance, and below the poverty line their entire life, why not utilize government loans and attend a Trade school for $1000-$10,000 total for and within 1-2 years they could be earning on average $50,000? Or, likewise, attend College for the first time or go back for a practical degree that would earn them a solid income?
Aug 2014
I don't think it is impossible for someone to become middle class, and there are still lots of middle class jobs out there that must be filled almost no matter the economic situation (unless it is a dystopian economic crash). Managers, people in the medical field. Banking. Business owners. People who work in transportation like airlines, trucking, freight, etc. people who work in law enforcement. Fire Department, most other governmental positions. The legal field.

There are lots of stuff out there where people make a middle class salary, that is to be able to have a car, having more than say, $20,000 in the bank, have a modest home or am making payments on said home. Most all the jobs I have listed (and there are more) will always require someone to do it.

College for some reason has gotten ridiculously expensive and it really should not be. I went to college 25 years ago and even then, I saw that there were a lot of fees for bullshit I was never going to use (like an "activity fee" for special events, concerts, fairs etc.) and forcing students to take classes for their degree on subjects which have nothing to do with their major (like Art History for Business Majors). There is another thread about this currently on this forum. College needs to be reformed, and students should only take classes for their major and job pursuit, costs should be lowered, and no more scholarships because you can dribble a ball or play a tuba.

One problem is that manufacturing died in the United States and went elsewhere. The post World War II generation had plenty of jobs in factories and manufacturing, decent jobs for good wages, usually unionized, which perpetuated the economy, middle class spending (on that 1954 Studabaker, my TV and yearly subscription to Playboy). Eventually globalization and other factors made that manufacturing sector to dry up, which was basically the heart of America for many decades. Sending manufacturing jobs to Mexico, China, and the Third World. People in Bangladesh will work for 20 USD cents one hour for fourteen hours without peeing on a hot, dusty factory floor making $10 Walmart blue jeans. No having to pay for medical insurance, overtime, or any of that bullshit. A lot of manufacturing now is cheap and shitty. Corporations do not care, which brings me to my next point......

I also feel that there is an active hostility of the corporations and companies against their employees, they see employees as expensive liabilities of limited benefit and are now employing or trying to employ systems that require less of us pesky employees wanting a living wage. Employees feel a great resentment towards their employer which breeds this sucks of resentment to hate of each other, when it is better for the corporation just to pay what the employee is worth, and the employee having loyalty to their employer. This dangerous rift has cracked open the last twenty to thirty years, and mechanism of services will only add to this. Many of these companies are extremely profitable and can do more for their workers.

You also have to see that the population of the United States is getting larger, 320 million people and rising. America has added about a hundred million more people since Reagan was Presidnt. So there are more people wanting and competing for these middle class jobs. Since there are more people, there is less space, and so the cost of the space goes up and up, which creates an underclass who cannot afford to buy or rent decent housing, creating the working homeless, which goes back to the second point of the simmering hostilities between companies and workers.

It is still easier to be middle class if you are white rather than black or latino. As a matter of fact, when someone says "middle class" we automatically think white people. Poor people are a very diverse group, not integrated but diverse. I think also that one has a chance to be middle class of they come from middle class circumstances. Rich people pass their knowledge of being rich to their children. The impoverished parents teach their kids how to make poverty a little less painful and how to make that can of Spam last, or how to buy $20 worth of groceries to last a week. Middle class people are no different.

  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Dec 2017
It is still easier to be middle class if you are white rather than black or latino. As a matter of fact, when someone says "middle class" we automatically think white people. Poor people are a very diverse group, not integrated but diverse. I think also that one has a chance to be middle class of they come from middle class circumstances. Rich people pass their knowledge of being rich to their children. The impoverished parents teach their kids how to make poverty a little less painful and how to make that can of Spam last, or how to buy $20 worth of groceries to last a week. Middle class people are no different.

First, I agree with many observations you made in your post. Now, I want to focus in on the bolded statement from you excerpt.

Give a coherent argument as to what would stop a reasonably savvy person (in this case "black or latino") from becoming a Plumber and earning a solid income, on average $50,000 (thus, entering the Middle-Class)
Nov 2012
Stay in school

Don’t make a baby until you’ve made a home

Learn a trade

It’s that simple.
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Dec 2017
It's easier to improve your life in Europe, more upward mobility.

The US ranks low in upward mobility.

Maybe that's why only people from shithole countries want to come here

That citing what people manage to do with inside the context of "the Game" provide--not how difficult it is for any one individual to move upward.

As has been submitted here, if one were to get a High School Diploma or G.E.D., not have a child when not coupled/paired off (and/or before an established career takes hold), goes to Trade School (which can be 100% funded by Government loans--as I described) or goes to College for a practical degree (in the manner I described), then they are virtually guaranteed a spot in the Middle Class or above.

I don't think that sounds like too difficult of criteria. Perhaps the largest problem (as I see it), is that people (overwhelmingly) are not given proper information about "the Game" they are going to be forced to play (whether they realize it or not)--whether it is the University system, job market, ect. It is such a tremendous failing of the "Education" system as well as "Parents" that they can't relay even the most elementary knowledge of how to effectively "play the Game" in order to succeed. In fact, they typically (A) Never/rarely discuss it at all (B ) Provide rampant misinformation about "the Rules" (and such) (C) Some combination of (A) & (B )
May 2018
that depends upon what you call "middle class" . some say it's having 10k in the bank and making 50k a year. EYE say that it's having a net worth of at least 1/4 million and an income of 100k a year (per adult in the home) If you go by my standard, hell YES it's hard to be middle class. If you go by the first standard, it's quite easy, if you know a few simple things. Like marry an Asian MD, and get paid $35k per year (cash) for 3 years until they become a citizen. Like using the money and VA home loans to buy sub 30k houses in OK and convert them to weekly room rentals. Each one will clear you 20k a year, ya know. 40k if you run it yourself. VA loans do not require any down payment or PMI, you know and you do NOT have to be a veteran to get one, either. You just have to KNOW a trustworthy vet.
Last edited: