Is Nazism a Statistically Relevant/Significant Concern in the Modern World?

Is Nazism a Statistically Relevant/Significant Concern in the Modern World?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 57.1%
  • No

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 14.3%

  • Total voters
    7
Sep 2017
808
187
Georgia
#2
Just because National Socialists change their uniforms, alter their rhetoric, and hide behind a thin veneer of respectability does not mean that they gave up their agenda.
 
Likes: 2 people
Dec 2017
1,646
791
USA
#3
Just because National Socialists change their uniforms, alter their rhetoric, and hide behind a thin veneer of respectability does not mean that they gave up their agenda.
Including more extreme ideological staples of Nazism such as Eugenics (which the entire ideology was/is based around)?
 
Sep 2017
808
187
Georgia
#4
Including more extreme ideological staples of Nazism such as Eugenics (which the entire ideology was/is based around)?
I find it amazing that if those who believe in eugenics jump onto a popular political issue, then mainstream conservatives will jump to their defense. It has put traditional conservatives at odds with their own conscience as they excuse and then side with those who believe in eugenics when both of them are working toward a common goal.
 
Dec 2017
1,646
791
USA
#5
I find it amazing that if those who believe in eugenics jump onto a popular political issue, then mainstream conservatives will jump to their defense. It has put traditional conservatives at odds with their own conscience as they excuse and then side with those who believe in eugenics when both of them are working toward a common goal.
I find it difficult to follow your argument here. Do you think significant amounts of people in the Modern World (particularly the West) believe in/support/promote Nazi-style Eugenics programs?
 
Dec 2017
1,646
791
USA
#7
No but it will bubble under the surface.
You think Nazi-style Eugenics programs are in significant danger of re-surfacing and being subscribed to by statistically substantial numbers of people in the near future (to such extent that it should really be on the publics radar at the moment)?
 
Sep 2017
808
187
Georgia
#8
I find it difficult to follow your argument here. Do you think significant amounts of people in the Modern World (particularly the West) believe in/support/promote Nazi-style Eugenics programs?
Do I believe it? No. I know it. I've been arguing with people on these discussion boards over their blatant support of the practice. Mainstream does not address it.
 
Sep 2017
877
389
Pennsylfaani
#9
You think Nazi-style Eugenics programs are in significant danger of re-surfacing and being subscribed to by statistically substantial numbers of people in the near future (to such extent that it should really be on the publics radar at the moment)?
No, but I think the concept of eugenics will be an elephant in the room that no one will want to talk about, but as genetic research becomes more and more advanced it will become a very large elephant indeed.
 
Likes: 1 person
Sep 2017
808
187
Georgia
#10
This will probably be my last post on this board, but I've been stalked by people who believe in eugenics as a religion.

I can tell you up front what it is like to be stalked by them and to have your life and the life of family members threatened by them. They are IN the mainstream.

The most likely place to find them is in the anti-immigrant movement. You see, it's not enough to agree with those people that we have a problem with foreigners, but if you dare challenge their solutions, you become a target. SOME of their antics include, but are not limited to following people on the Internet and stalking them, stealing their ID, creating fake profiles of their target - the last one had my stalker creating a fake profile on a professional site and I became an "agent of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation." These people have shot at me, killed the family cat and strung it up over a tree limb in the back yard. They have contacted my employer with all kinds of idiotic allegations.

The reality for them is that the current anti-immigrant effort is controlled by those who believe in eugenics. John Tanton, who bankrolls the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), NumbersUSA... a dozen or so anti-immigrant non-profits believes in eugenics as if it were a religion.

When I was a kid, it was Tanton who supplied David Duke, the former Nazi turned KKK leader with his talking points. Duke is the father of the current anti-immigrant effort which began with Border Watch in the 1970s and culminated in the current effort. Today, David Duke and his college buddy, Don Black are supportive of efforts like Stormfront (that Black founded IIRC) and they supply the talking points and foot soldiers for the current anti-immigrant effort.

Steve Bannon was another of their converts. He was also into eugenics.

Again, it was not enough to agree that we have a problem with foreigners in the United States, in order to be on the team, you have to agree with their solutions. Their solutions, if you can call National Socialism a solution, is their incessant war against Liberty and Freedom, the building of a POLICE STATE, censoring to all opposition (even if you agree there is an addressable issue.) These people have no use for the Fourth Amendment, private property Rights, nor the Freedom to offer up a viable solution.

If you really want to know how much power these people wield, follow the money behind the anti-immigrant effort. Watch what happens to people like me on the Internet. We get censored... and we get too effective, we get killed. These people have the ear of Donald Trump and they exist and they ARE dangerous.
 

Similar Discussions