Mother, 38, is arrested in front of her children and locked in a cell for seven HOURS after calling a transgender woman a man on Twitter

Dec 2013
33,811
19,359
Beware of watermelons
#41
Can you document that she was "just telling the truth"?
Do you have the transcripts of what she said / did?

Furthermore, "truth" is not a defense against "harassment". Surely even you recognize this.
But I guess not if the person doing the harassing is targeting gays or transgender, eh?

It's pathetic how people like you make an assumption and then conclude "rainbow warriors are so oversensitive" based on details you imagine and want to be true...

Well, the police contact was regarding the insane made up leftist term "deadnaming" so if the rest has anything to do w/ that crazy postmodernist nonsense then, no it is not a crime. It is just telling the truth.

Yes, rainbow warriors are hypersensitive.

"Im going to live in a fantasy land and i want you to play make believe w/ me. If you dont you are a sexist racist homophobic nazi"
 
Nov 2012
40,781
11,759
Lebanon, TN
#42
High Court papers obtained by The Mail on Sunday detail how Mrs Scottow is accused of a 'campaign of targeted harassment' against Miss Hayden, allegedly motivated by her 'status as a transgender woman'.

The papers claim that, as a 'toxic' debate raged online over plans to allow people to 'self-ID' as another gender, Mrs Scottow tweeted 'defamatory' messages about Miss Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to 'harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets' about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was 'racist, xenophobic and a crook' and mocking her as a 'fake lawyer'.

It seems that there is a little more to it.
'
So you are saying that Mr Hayden was harassing her on line.

He partook in the exchange which makes him a voluntary participant in the exchange.

he has a penis he is a man... when he has the surgery then he will be a female.
 
Nov 2005
8,811
3,304
California
#43
Well, the police contact was regarding the insane made up leftist term "deadnaming" ...
No, no, no, no...
The police contact was made based on their interpretation of the facts resulting in an arrestable action.
Don't give me this crap of "leftists say..." That's a sleazy cop-out. By this mentality, any leftist victim is automatically disbelieved based on any "leftist term" present in the description... :rolleyes:

I'm not looking at some leftist who is saying "This guy should be arrested because I'm offended!"
I'm looking at a police arrest based on an assessment of harassment / defamation.

Try again and this time use the facts. How much you dislike leftists and/or their supposed "terminology" is irrelevant to the legitimacy of the arrest.


'So you are saying that Mr Hayden was harassing her on line.
He partook in the exchange which makes him a voluntary participant in the exchange.
he has a penis he is a man... when he has the surgery then he will be a female.
Some people use the phrase "So you are saying ..." as an introductory method to introduce their strawman argument. Which is exactly what you just did.
Just because two people participate in something at one stage doesn't magically make "harassment" a non-issue. By this limited means of thinking, a person can never be "harassed" by a co-worker because that person chose to go to work... :zany:
 
Last edited:
Likes: catus felis

Similar Discussions