- Jun 2018
- South Dakota
When Col Vindiman was asked who the two people he talked to about his concern he named one but not the other. Shifty immediately jumped on it talking over everyone, howling that he wouldn't allow the outing of the whistleblower. You're barking up the wrong tree. It's Shifty who has brought up the whistle blower. After that exchange it became obvious that Vindman is the conduit of information that cued the whistleblower to make his move. Not allowing the question will come around and bite ol Shifty on his ass in the public opinion arena. Remember that the entire case has boiled down to what the Dems can get the public to believe.Nunes just keeps whining about "the whistleblower" it's not fair...."the whistleblower" it's not fair.
AND who was it that said "Women are so emotional"?
The case is being peeled like an onion and the Dems are losing. It was just mentioned that the word demand was used by both the whistleblower and Col Vindman. I see that as either collusion between them or an unintended error by the Dems when they coached them to describe the call as being a "demand".