Proof that Concealed Carry is a Dream World

Mar 2013
8,662
9,339
Middle Tennessee
The problem with using a country like Brazil as a study is that the concept of restrictive gun laws being at all effective assumes a competent and non-corrupt police force, conditions that Brazil doesn't possess.

The article I read stated the police are the final arbiters of whether or not you "need" a gun. Even if you meet the other requirements they get the final veto. It seems they reject more than 90%. The new pres intends to do away with that last obstacle as well as lowing the age able to purchase from 25 to 21.
 
Nov 2012
5,603
3,325
Kekistan
So if a priest is found not guilty of child molestation, the child abuse allowed him to be proven innocent? Not making much sense.
No, if the priest is found not guilty, then the abuse did not happen under the eyes of the law
See OJ Simpson murder case and Michael Jackson child sexual molestation case for clarification
 
Nov 2012
5,603
3,325
Kekistan
Watch Brazil over the next few months. In spite of very restrictive gun laws they had more than 64,000 murders. 70% of those were by fire arm. Their new president intends to relax the gun laws allowing citizens to own and carry. Guess we'll see if the narco terrorists, general malcontents and criminals keep up their war on society or if citizens shooting back makes them think twice.
Excellent post
Gracias
 
Nov 2018
1,342
434
Montana
Had it not been for them having firearms, there would have been no standoff. There would have not been a not guilty verdict. Its obvious. A group of armed citizens, did in fact stand up to the government. They prevailed due to the fact they were armed, even if the arms in and among its self were not the primary vindication
So if a priest is found not guilty of child molestation, the child abuse allowed him to be proven innocent? Not making much sense.

No, if the priest is found not guilty, then the abuse did not happen under the eyes of the law
See OJ Simpson murder case and Michael Jackson child sexual molestation case for clarification
So how exactly did the "armed response" create the not guilty verdict? The criminal acts occurred. A trial resulted that was poorly prosecuted and the defendants did not receive due process and the court found then NOT GUILTY. Their actions were not proven lawful and armed resistance was not validated. Many criminals fail to be convicted in court but their criminal acts remain as unlawful. Or did I miss some new legal prinicple that was imposed by the judge to allow every gun nut to threaten Federal marshalls with firearms?
 
Nov 2012
5,603
3,325
Kekistan
So how exactly did the "armed response" create the not guilty verdict? The criminal acts occurred. A trial resulted that was poorly prosecuted and the defendants did not receive due process and the court found then NOT GUILTY. Their actions were not proven lawful and armed resistance was not validated. Many criminals fail to be convicted in court but their criminal acts remain as unlawful. Or did I miss some new legal prinicple that was imposed by the judge to allow every gun nut to threaten Federal marshalls with firearms?
I get you are a Socialist who only believes what you believe is right regardless of a democratic vote or a trial by jury verdict. Unfortunately if a verdict of not guilty is pronounced in a trial by law then its not guilty. The end.
 
Likes: Jimmyb
Nov 2018
1,342
434
Montana
I get you are a Socialist who only believes what you believe is right regardless of a democratic vote or a trial by jury verdict. Unfortunately if a verdict of not guilty is pronounced in a trial by law then its not guilty. The end.
You have finally given up the concept that somehow the assault on federal officers was validated as an allowable constitution expression against tyranny. Good progress.
 
Jun 2012
41,363
14,997
Barsoom
You have finally given up the concept that somehow the assault on federal officers was validated as an allowable constitution expression against tyranny. Good progress.
That is why the term "free country" was changed to "free state" in the Second Amendment.