Schumer offers 35 year-old trick_ open government and then we’ll talk border control

Nov 2012
40,545
11,692
Lebanon, TN
#61
An association fallacy is an informal inductive fallacy of the hasty-generalization or red-herring type and which asserts, by irrelevant association and often by appeal to emotion, that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another. Two types of association fallacies are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association. the norwegians run their oil industry and do a fine job of it
it isnt a bad idea actually Equinor - Wikipedia

Yawn. Bump, back to sleep.
 
Sep 2018
6,679
1,112
cleveland ohio
#63
Cortez preaches the ideology of Germany in 1933
-
You can add to the list her anti-Semitic racism
View attachment 2632
you cant possibly be that stupid again i can refute every thing you say with two links this is so tire some do to deal with such intellctual sloth hitler banned porn and was oppsed class struggle that list is completely wrong you are so sad


An Euler diagram illustrating the association fallacy. Although A is within B and is also within C, not all of B is within C.
In notation of first-order logic, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (x S : φ(x)) ⇒ (xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true."
 
Sep 2018
6,679
1,112
cleveland ohio
#64
Yawn. Bump, back to sleep.
Reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of association fallacy.[3][4] The argument is that a policy leads to – or is the same as – one advocated or implemented by Adolf Hitler or the Third Reich and so "proves" that the original policy is undesirable.
Another instance of reductio ad Hitlerum is asking a question of the form "You know who else...?" with the deliberate intent of impugning a certain idea or action by implying Hitler held that idea or performed such action.[5]
An invocation of Hitler or Nazism is not a reductio ad Hitlerum when it illuminates the argument instead of causing distraction from it.[6]
 
Sep 2018
6,679
1,112
cleveland ohio
#65
Why no link to your horseshit of a chart?

Ever heard of Godwin's Law?
this is so laughable it would be a joke if he wasnt so serious, for example class struggle, thats what marxists were about he put them in camps, does anyon have any idea what the penalty was for porn? a camp, weimar republic now that was decadent the nazis exact oppsite, the pathetic thng is he beleives it he has never studied history my family knows the hard way, stupid stupid americans without a clue, they have nonotion of th world, stupid and arrogant, a dangerous combination
 
Sep 2018
6,679
1,112
cleveland ohio
#67
Yawn. Bump, back to sleep.
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man."
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.
Straw man tactics in the United Kingdom can be known as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name, where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.[4][5] Straw man - Wikipedia
 
Sep 2018
6,679
1,112
cleveland ohio
#68
Yawn. Bump, back to sleep.

U.S. President William McKinley has shot a cannon (labeled McKinley's Letter) which has involved a "straw man" and its constructors (Carl Schurz, Oswald Garrison Villard, Richard Olney) in a great explosion. Caption: S M A S H E D !, Harper's Weekly, September 22, 1900
As a fallacy, the identification and name of straw man arguments are of relatively recent date, although Aristotle makes remarks that suggest a similar concern;[6] Douglas Walton identified "the first inclusion of it we can find in a textbook as an informal fallacy" in Stuart
 
Sep 2017
2,088
1,072
Hell
#70
A steel wall can be cut. It can be climbed over. It can be tunneled under and it can be gone around.
No one is denying that. Your very own article has the CBP pointing that out and explaining what the wall is meant to do. All you have been doing is creating strawmen, throwing red herrings, and deflecting because of your own obsession in your head that the wall is claimed to be a impenetrable barrier.

And most of the drugs come in through the ports of entry or by ship/boat. And most illegals flew in legal and overstayed their visa.
More of the same strawman/red herring/deflection. Not once have I mentioned drugs. but since we're at it, please explain how you would know how much drugs come through an unsecured border if the smugglers are not caught by wall impediment?

Steel in even less penetrable than concrete but that is almost irrelevant because it is a very expensive effort with minimal result.
Rest easy, it is not your money. I do not believe that there has been anyone here that thinks the wall is cheap. "Minimal" is subjective as value is in the eye of the beholder.

Lying Trump just keeps lying and the Trumpanzees keep swallowing.
I have already explained to you and others numerous times that not joining in the insanity of TDS does not make anyone a Trump supporter, yet you a Canadian - which are supposed to be polite and accommodating - continue to insist on implying otherwise by using such terms as Trumpanzee. So for once I'm going to talk like you: Dumbfuckanzees are too fucking stupid to debate because they can't get their TDS goggled eyes out of their own asses to be civil and shove Trump down other people's throats. Dumbfuckanzees are too stupid to recognize that Trump is in their own head, not the other way around. Dumbfuckanzees can't debate without name-calling and referring to others that is not obsessed with their own blind hatred as a being inferior in intellect.

See the thread I am about to post.
Go for it big boy. Make Justin proud.