Some 2nd Amendment History

Dec 2013
31,211
18,691
Beware of watermelons
#31
What exactly is your point in saying that?
*speaks very slowly, in a quiet and calming voice*

Hi Hollywood. How are you today? Would you like to be closer to the window so you can look at the birds? Here, let me get you a blanket. There, there...that is much better, huh?
 
Likes: 3 people
Dec 2014
25,114
13,550
Memphis, Tn.
#33
*speaks very slowly, in a quiet and calming voice*

Hi Hollywood. How are you today? Would you like to be closer to the window so you can look at the birds? Here, let me get you a blanket. There, there...that is much better, huh?
Going to dodge the question, huh?

No surprise. :lol:
 
Nov 2012
5,668
3,384
Kekistan
#34
Slavery was ended over a century ago, at least it was supposed to be, based on what it says in the same Constitution. What's this about - why is it in the political ideologies section? Is the Democratic party planning on becoming more overt about trying to bring back slavery, or something?
Of course the Democrat party is wanting a peasant class. How many times have you heard from liberals that illegal aliens will do the jobs American wont. That is nothing but a call for the leftists elites to have a cheap peasant class that will also vote for them.
 
Likes: 1 person
Nov 2012
5,668
3,384
Kekistan
#35
Isn't/wasn't slavery a political ideology? No one wants to bring back slavery--at least no one that I know.

This is a discussion about the original intent (or at least ONE of the intents) of the 2nd amendment...and WHY it became an amendment.
Slavery was a constitutional right. So, it got repealed. It took a civil war to take away the Democrat elites slaves but it was done. It took a Republican led nation to repeal slavery. That is the history you do not want to talk about

"We need illegal immigrants to do the work Americans will not"- Liberal idealogy
 
Likes: 1 person
Nov 2012
39,234
11,473
Lebanon, TN
#36
Ever see the movie "Django Unchained"?? Leonardo DiCaprio in Django Unchained asks, “Why don’t they just rise up [slaves] and kill the whites?” If the movie were real, it would have been a purely rhetorical question, because every southerner of the era knew the simple answer: Well regulated militias kept the slaves in chains.

Ever wonder why the 2nd Amendment....was/is an amendment??
Curious about the wording of the 2nd Amendment?

James Madison, who had (at Jefferson’s insistence) already begun to prepare proposed amendments to the Constitution, changed his first draft of one that addressed the militia issue to make sure it was unambiguous that the southern states could maintain their slave patrol militias.

His first draft for what became the Second Amendment had said: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed, and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country [emphasis mine]: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person.”


There's much more: https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/second-amendment-ratified-preserve-slavery/
And what about clause 2 of the 2nd amendment... you seem to shy away from that.

the PEOPLES right. you see the RIGHT TO FORM A WELL REGULATED MILITIA is a right granted to the STATE not the people.

The Peoples right to Keep and bear arms is INDIVIDUAL rights. and the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE is the right the only right it the constitution that the founders said SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

YOUR problem in your post is you have a right GRANTED TO THE STATE GOVERNMENT being a right of the individual. you got it backward.
 
Likes: 1 person
Nov 2012
5,668
3,384
Kekistan
#37
Well no, not just a personal opinion of mine; it's a pattern I consistently observe. I suppose I may have come across as sounding a bit misleading by virtue of neglecting to put better effort in bringing up the Republican's role in being just as culpable. What I mean is that it's the Democrats who historically were the overt proponents of preserving the institution of slavery, 3/5ths of a person, etc., and they're the ones who are trying to implement Leftist/socialist ideology, which is in essence a form of slavery, by virtue of trying to force the individual to take a back seat to the collective, but it's modern day Republicans who have been responsible, or at least complicit, in trying to strip away the 2nd Amendment, which is in a manner of speaking & for one thing, our insurance policy against being enslaved.
 
Dec 2015
13,802
12,680
Arizona
#38
So your point is that slavery was as successful as it was for as long as it was is because of government?

That is nice.


WHAT is wrong with you?? I didn't write the piece. I posted the piece because I thought it was an interesting slant on history.

The point (NOT MINE) is that the 2nd amendment BECAME an amendment because our white, wealthy, slave-owning founders were afraid of a slave uprising IF THE BLACK folks HAD ACCESS TO GUNS and IF their white owners didn't.....

unless I have misunderstood the OP. AND THAT is what I wanted DTT to discuss.

Obviously, you missed THE OBVIOUS...but you've been doing a lot of that lately.
 
Jul 2015
4,799
2,185
chicago
#39
WHAT is wrong with you?? I didn't write the piece. I posted the piece because I thought it was an interesting slant on history.

The point (NOT MINE) is that the 2nd amendment BECAME an amendment because our white, wealthy, slave-owning founders were afraid of a slave uprising IF THE BLACK folks HAD ACCESS TO GUNS and IF their white owners didn't.....

unless I have misunderstood the OP. AND THAT is what I wanted DTT to discuss.

Obviously, you missed THE OBVIOUS...but you've been doing a lot of that lately.
It would be something if any version of the amendment had some reference to slavery or something in it anything that referenced it but there is absolutely nothing there what so ever.
 
Likes: 1 person
Dec 2015
13,802
12,680
Arizona
#40
And what about clause 2 of the 2nd amendment... you seem to shy away from that.

the PEOPLES right. you see the RIGHT TO FORM A WELL REGULATED MILITIA is a right granted to the STATE not the people.

The Peoples right to Keep and bear arms is INDIVIDUAL rights. and the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE is the right the only right it the constitution that the founders said SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

YOUR problem in your post is you have a right GRANTED TO THE STATE GOVERNMENT being a right of the individual. you got it backward.


Right, Einstein. Yeah--I "shied" away from the 2nd clause EVEN THOUGH I posted it.