The Torpedo That Will Sink Them

May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#1
Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead. David Farragut

It only took one torpedo to sink the Lusitania:


Democrats have been hit by so many torpedoes since Trump took office I am amazed, and pleased, they are still going full speed ahead. The way they treated Brett Kavanaugh blew a huge hole in their boat below the waterline, but illegal alien caravans coming up from Mexico is the torpedo that will send the Democrat Party to the bottom. Let me begin with the U.N.

The United Nations will simply classify illegal aliens as “economic refugees.”​

Ivy League Study Fudging Immigration Number

As expected the government of Mexico put up token resistance at their southern border (video laughable) and allows thousands of economic migrants passage to the U.S. Mexico border.​
Rebuking the strongly worded demands of President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo the insufferable Mexican Foreign Secretary Luis Videgaray tells media his country will now call on the United Nations to intervene. Yes, it’s up to the U.N. now….
Migration Horde Advances, Next Stop USA – Mexico Puts Up Token Resistance, Promises To Call on United Nations…​
Posted on October 19, 2018​
by sundance​

“. . . massive collective expulsions . . .” my ass.

The U.N. special investigator on the human rights of migrants has a message for the Mexican and U.S. governments: Respect the human rights of every person on the caravan heading from Central America and consider each case individually.​
Felipe Gonzalez Morales told a news conference at U.N. headquarters in New York on Friday that "there cannot be massive collective expulsions, for instance, in violation of international law."​
The Latest: UN calls on Mexico, US to respect migrants​
Updated 4:34 pm CDT, Friday, October 19, 2018​
Do not let them in and they will not have to be expelled. The truth is that U.N. bums know damn well that once they get in they are in forever after they access every welfare state program —— and ACLU lawyers defending them with tax dollars.

Should President Trump use the military on American soil to stop the invasion Democrats and their media mouths are sure to invoke the:


Posse Comitatus Act​
The title of the act comes from the legal concept of posse comitatus, the authority under which a county sheriff, or other law officer, conscripts any able-bodied man to assist her or him in keeping the peace.​

Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia

Frankly, there is no limit on stopping foreign invaders from disturbing the peace:

Active-duty personnel face strict limits on their ability to operate on U.S. soil. An 1878 law bans federal troops from enforcing domestic laws, a concern that critics raised with Obama. National Guard troops primarily served in support roles during past border deployments.​
Trump says he will deploy U.S. military to southern border​
By Jordan Fabian - 04/03/18 01:05 PM EDT​
First, have a sheriff form a posse made up of able-bodied military personnel arrest and immediately deport foreigners disturbing the peace. The very presence of illegal aliens disturbs the peace. Old-time sheriffs used to run them out of town. There is nothing prohibiting today’s sheriffs from running them out of the country.

Secondly, President Trump’s constitutional authority as commander in chief in addition to his oath of office —— the only oath in the Constitution —— gives every president double-edged authorization to send the U.S. military to stop invasions originating in foreign lands. In short: Sending the U.S. military into Mexico to prevent a United Nations invading army from reaching our borders is exactly like Korea and Vietnam.

NOTE: Korea was a United Nations police action.

Media mouths are beginning the use the template they invented for Vietnam:


Mainstream media joins the Honduran 'caravan'​
By Jennifer Harper​
Friday, October 19, 2018​
Parenthetically, Democrats will always invoke the Posse Comitatus Act in order to keep the borders open, but not one Democrat (and some Republicans) will ever defend the:


The Monroe Doctrine is of paramount importance when United Nations scum send enemy combats to this country from the Middle East and Africa for the sole purpose of colonizing.

Basically, enforcing the Monroe Doctrine should be the bulwark that protects the American people —— not the Posse Comitatus Act, nor a visible wall that is easily breached.
 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#2
Do not let them in and they will not have to be expelled. The truth is that U.N. bums know damn well that once they get in they are in forever after they access every welfare state program —— and ACLU lawyers defending them with tax dollars.
Donald Trump won the election on stopping illegal immigration. Democrats and their media mouths now claim that letting illegal aliens in is a winning strategy for the midterms. The question is why Democrats are going full speed ahead? The answer is Hillary Clinton’s false claim that she won the popular vote. In short: The Electoral College means nothing when Americans get to vote on an issue like illegal immigration. That strategy assumes that Americans who voted against open-borders in the presidential election will vote for illegal immigration in the midterms.

As usual, it comes down to voter turnout. Will more Americans who believe in their country’s sovereignty come out? or can all of the power and influence the global government crowd is mustering convince enough Americans to vote against their own country?


Stretching for miles, 7,000-strong migrant caravan treks through stifling heat in southern Mexico​
By Kate Linthicum​
Oct 21, 2018 | 6:20 PM​
Tapachula, Mexico​

If the midterms is about anything it is the U.S. versus the U.N. The question is: Does President Trump have the political courage to invoke all of his constitutional authority and to hell with the media?

Secondly, President Trump’s constitutional authority as commander in chief in addition to his oath of office —— the only oath in the Constitution —— gives every president double-edged authorization to send the U.S. military to stop invasions originating in foreign lands. In short: Sending the U.S. military into Mexico to prevent a United Nations invading army from reaching our borders is exactly like Korea and Vietnam.
 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#3
The answer is Hillary Clinton’s false claim that she won the popular vote. In short: The Electoral College means nothing when Americans get to vote on an issue like illegal immigration. That strategy assumes that Americans who voted against open-borders in the presidential election will vote for illegal immigration in the midterms.

You better believe that ol’ Bobblehead will run against the Electoral College in 2020.

See Hillary agree she's 'real president'​
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 10/22/2018 @ 12:02 pm​

 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#4
The Monroe Doctrine is of paramount importance when United Nations scum send enemy combats to this country from the Middle East and Africa for the sole purpose of colonizing.

Basically, enforcing the Monroe Doctrine should be the bulwark that protects the American people —— not the Posse Comitatus Act, nor a visible wall that is easily breached.
When is the global government crowd going to admit that First World countries are being colonized? In short: European empires colonized by force of arms. That same military force better be used to repel mass migrations before the American people pay the heaviest price for touchy-feely liberalism and tax dollar HUMAN RIGHTS.

Globalization isn't going quite according to plan. The French president, in defiance of political correctness openly worries African immigration could swamp the whole of Europe and "aid" is powerless to stop it. "The challenge of Africa is completely different, it is ... civilizational ... failing states, complex democratic transitions, the demographic transition ... in some countries today seven or eight children [are] born to each woman," Emmanuel Macron said. It is one more indication, as Ross Douthat of the New York Times notes, that Western leaders are starting to worry that their assumptions about the global world could prove drastically wrong.​
The first thing they have to admit is that population controls will not work.

African birthrates haven’t slowed as fast as Western experts once expected ... by century’s end two in five human beings could be African ... but ... over the same period, Europe’s population is likely to drop by about 100 million. ... the experience of recent refugee crises has demonstrated to European leaders both how easily populations can move northward, and how much harder assimilation may be than they once hoped.​

Projections that underpinned the liberal policies of population control, climate change, open borders, soft power are now suspect. Open borders advocates wait with bated breath as central American refugee "caravans" headed for the United States in a replay of the migrant crisis that changed the political landscape Europe. Even a giant column from Honduras wound towards the US border yet another U.S.-bound caravan was taking shape in El Salvador. "As the Trump administration makes preparations to combat the 6,500-member Honduran migrant caravan making its way toward the United States, the Department of Homeland Security is also tracking a new caravan taking shape — this time from El Salvador."​
Ironically the caravans could wind up boosting Donald Trump the way the European refugee flows crippled Angela Merkel. Her position as "Leader of the Free World" now seems over as "her junior coalition partners, the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), saw support in Bavaria halved." It would be one more hint that liberal policy analysts miscalculated badly.​
Just how weak the globalist orthodoxy has now become was illustrated by Italy's budgetary defiance of the European Union. "In what is becoming a dangerous game of chicken for the global economy, Italy’s populist government refused to budge on Tuesday after the European Union for the first time sent back a member state’s proposed budget because it violated the bloc’s fiscal laws and posed unacceptable risks." The Atlantic notes that far from being fearful of Brussels the Italians are raring for a fight. The Independent suggests that Rome's open revolt is now a bigger threat to the EU than Brexit. "It could finish the euro ... Add the migrant crisis" and you have a perfect storm.​
The chief challenges to globalization now stem from the cascading failures of the system itself principally in the effect of China, Russia and MENA's refusal to democratize. With hostiles inside the wire Western political parties are realizing that they are no longer complete masters of their own house. Russian collusion and Saudi influence are but different names for foreign influence now rampant in what used to be domestic affairs.​
Bloomberg describes how one Canadian city was lost to Chinese money. "Vancouver was the first place to experience the tidal wave of Chinese cash. Now the city is leading efforts to stop it ... a seamy mingling of clean and dirty cash in casinos, real estate, and luxury goods made possible by historic ties to China and by Canada’s lax record of fighting financial crime. ... The money is arriving so fast, and in such volume, though, that standing by is no longer an option. Vancouver was perhaps the first major Western city to experience the full force of Chinese capital. Soon, it could be the first to learn what happens when you try to stop it ... 'large-scale, transnational money laundering has been occurring' and .... those funds are filtering further into the economy."​
Those funds are now filtering into politics. Perhaps no one so emphatically underscored the extent of Chinese influence in America as vice president Mike Pence. "Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach to advance its influence and benefit its interests. It’s employing this power in more proactive and coercive ways to interfere in the domestic policies of this country and to interfere in the politics of the United States. The Chinese Communist Party is rewarding or coercing American businesses, movie studios, universities, think tanks, scholars, journalists, and local, state, and federal officials. And worst of all, China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections."​
Migrant waves and money laundering are in fact two aspects of the same open border effect. The Third World elites "crumbling their countries with corruption" can move themselves and their money in the same way their destitute masses can follow after them. Why should anyone have "skin in the game" in a the survival of a particular country if they live in a borderless world? Since neither immigration through a bank or over the fence provides adequate insulation, individual level sanctions as typified by the Magnitsky Act are belatedly being adopted to redress this deficiency, but they are individualized responses to a systemic problem.​
The failure of the establishment to anticipate its drawbacks left it vulnerable to the crisis of 2016. They are in disarray to this day. The next few years ought to be dominated by efforts to rebuild the Western consensus if the global world is to survive. But can it evolve? Paradoxically the biggest threat to successful adaptation may prove to be the intransigence of its ideological supporters who are so angry at the collapse of their vision they sometimes forget where their best interests lie.​
Yet the death of a dream does not necessarily mean the birth of a nightmare. The future still lies before us, just not the one pundits imagined at the turn of the 21st century. If Macron is worried about a Gallic-free future he'll have to think of something. For too many however, it's no and no again if they can't have exactly what they want.​

Can the global world evolve?​
By Richard Fernandez October 24, 2018​
 
Nov 2012
41,006
11,805
Lebanon, TN
#5
lets see 41 seats have been lost by republicans since Trump took office.

Obama there were 1,042 seats lost by democrats in the first 2 years.
 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#6
If the midterms is about anything it is the U.S. versus the U.N. The question is: Does President Trump have the political courage to invoke all of his constitutional authority and to hell with the media?
Help Do What? is the question when the invasion of unarmed illegal aliens was planned and coordinated by the United Nations:

Hundreds of U.S. troops are set to make their way to the southern border to help Homeland Security and the National Guard as a caravan with thousands of migrants moves north, a U.S. official confirmed to Fox News on Thursday.​
The official said roughly 800 soldiers will be sent to the area to offer “logistical support," including providing tents and vehicles.​

Hundreds of US troops heading to the border to deal with migrant caravan, official says​
Lucas Tomlinson​

Basically, President Trump has to dodge Posse Comitatus, beat back illegal aliens claiming political asylum, as well as tell the United Nations to shove non-existent International law where the sun never shines.
 
May 2018
960
77
East Coast Of U.S.A.
#7
Basically, President Trump has to dodge Posse Comitatus, beat back illegal aliens claiming political asylum, as well as tell the United Nations to shove non-existent International law where the sun never shines.
Andrew Napolitano cherry picked the parts of the Constitution and the laws that affirm his own moral worldview. Notice how he slides from Creator to liberalism’s preferred word —— Humanity:

VIDEO ▼

Napolitano: What the law says about approaching caravan

The judge was playing fast and loose with the oath of office. I cannot find the part that says presidents swear to uphold the law. If there is any truth in Nappy’s nonsense presidents must uphold gun control laws regardless of the Second Amendment not to mention uphold every crazy law dopey presidents sign that were passed by Democrats.

Each president recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.​

Stopping the invasion in Mexico is the only way President Trump can preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. If letting illegal aliens —— CRIMINALS —— come in with a claim of asylum as Napolitano suggests the Constitution itself is invalidated.

Note that each member of Congress recites a similar oath at the beginning of each of his or her terms in office.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.​

Every member of Congress that supports open-borders violates their oath “. . . I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic . . .”.

If illegal aliens —— CRIMINALS —— organized into an invading force are not an enemy every dictionary definition needs an update:

enemy (noun)
plural enemies​
1. One who feels hatred toward, intends injury to, or opposes the interests of another; a foe.​
2. a. A hostile power or force, such as a nation. b. A member or unit of such a force.​
3. A group of foes or hostile forces. See Usage Note at collective noun.​
4. Something destructive or injurious in its effects: “Art hath an enemy called Ignorance” (Ben Jonson).​
adjective
Of, relating to, or being a hostile power or force.​