Trump May Get His Wall After All

Dec 2012
20,127
8,428
California
Coming unglued are you? Liberal? Junior, you have your head so far up the National Socialist's azz, they have to fart in order for you to get a breath of fresh air. You're the real liberal. You do more by accident to destroy America than the liberals can do on purpose. Then, after all your name calling, you can't one single freaking citation to back your idiotic claims. I'm embarrassed FOR you. Show us the original intent.
Well, there you go, can't make reasonable argument without resorting to vulgarity. But then, when that's all you got....
 
Mar 2018
1,225
213
Grayson
These laws concern themselves with Due Process and Equal Protection. Anyone within this country is afforded those protections. Nowhere in those cases do you find the SCOTUS granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. Here's a thought, try reading the citizenship clause of the 14th amendment, it's original intent, and then apply that to your boneheaded argument. Truth is, you have no argument to base your faulty rhetoric on. You have not, nor will you ever be able to win an argument on this issue with your defective understanding of the Constitution.
You were given a UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULING THAT DISPROVES YOUR STATEMENT.
 
Dec 2012
20,127
8,428
California
No such thing happened anywhere outside of your imagination.
Attack you? You mean to say that your interpretation of the Constitution IS important and relevant, more so than that of the SCOTUS?
You call that an attack?
You're kinda' sensitive, aren't you?
If you take the time to read SC ruling over the decades, you will soon learn that the original intent of the Constitutional authors was to make the SC the least powerful. They did that for a reason. That reason (activist courts) has come to fruition. The Constitution was intended to be a restriction of the Fed. government but, with the Courts help, those restrictions have fallen by the wayside. The SC does NOT have Legislative power yet, they have ho problem creating law that does not exist in Congress. Interpretation of the law was to be their only power.
 
Dec 2012
20,127
8,428
California
You were given a UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULING THAT DISPROVES YOUR STATEMENT.
What SC ruling? You've provided nothing proving the SC has granted citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. None of the cases you've provided is on point. But keep it coming because, making a fool of you is getting easier with each of your posts.
 
Mar 2018
1,225
213
Grayson
They are the law until the SP says otherwise. I asked for a SCOTUS ruling giving citizenship to illegal aliens. You gave me Wong Kim Ark, a case that is NOT on point. If you cannot provide such a ruling your argument is moot. Try reading the applicable statute, its original intent, and apply it to your abysmal attempt at running that crap passed me. As a Liberal, I'd be very surprised if you could come with $2., let alone $2000.
Yes, the case IS on point. You simply have never taken any course of any kind in law. If the case were not on point, your self appointed "Chosen One" would have deported the children of undocumented parents when the parents were deported. You are fooling nobody.

You are the liberal AND I think I know who you are now. You kind of gave yourself away. Most sensible in this country know full well I'm not a liberal. But, you're doing a LOT to aid them. If you are the poster boy you pretend to be, the entire right is pretty well screwed. I think you are actually another poster that is known by many to be a paid troll and a distraction. You screwed yourself and gave yourself up when you called me a liberal. Nice try. This time I have the advantage. You really don't know who I am. Tell Chuck Schumer you need some new way to do this without getting yourself outed.