Trump reportedly won't meet with Pelosi on a coronavirus bill, or for any reason, because he's mad at her

Jul 2019
12,616
9,215
Georgia
Trump isn't dumb enough to fall for Nancy's trick.

He knows she just want another photo op and a chance to play over-aged mean girl.

Sorry Nancy!

Point your finger, tear up speeches and clap sarcastically on your own time.

If Nancy Pelosi reallly wants to do something about CV, let her get her ass to work and originate a spending bill like the House she "leads" is supposed to. Make it so good the GOP Senate will be scared not to pass it and Trump will be scared not to sign.

He's a socialist at heart, always has been. Send him the bill. He'll take full credit for it and sign it.

But that part about him taking full credit won't bother a mature non-partisan leader who just wants what's best for the people, I'm sure.
both Pence and trump have been around people who have tested positive for it

setting Nancy up for the blame when she becomes President is 5-D checkers
 
Mar 2020
1,429
371
Land of Freedom
Trump isn't dumb enough to fall for Nancy's trick.

He knows she just want another photo op and a chance to play over-aged mean girl.

Sorry Nancy!

Point your finger, tear up speeches and clap sarcastically on your own time.

If Nancy Pelosi reallly wants to do something about CV, let her get her ass to work and originate a spending bill like the House she "leads" is supposed to. Make it so good the GOP Senate will be scared not to pass it and Trump will be scared not to sign.

He's a socialist at heart, always has been. Send him the bill. He'll take full credit for it and sign it.

But that part about him taking full credit won't bother a mature non-partisan leader who just wants what's best for the people, I'm sure.
Perhaps he won't meet with her because she looks like she has bad breath?
 
Feb 2020
1,722
634
Houston
both Pence and trump have been around people who have tested positive for it

setting Nancy up for the blame when she becomes President is 5-D checkers
Why would Nancy want to meet with them if the are potential sources of coronavirus?
 
Nov 2005
10,128
5,499
California
It's always a trick with that woman.
Which is a good idea, if you are tired of being tricked by that person.
No misdeed on this project.
Yet.
In a corporate world, this sort of behavior is juvenile.


Let me guess: You don't admit any misdeeds by Pelosi, ever?
I hate Pelosi and the sooner she leaves office the happier I will be.
But if we were to compare Pelosi to Trump, Trump is the one who is more untrustworthy.


Her past behavior doesn't give a bit of confidence that she is suddenly sincere this time.
THEN WHY DID REPUBS PUT HER IN CHARGE OF A CORONAVIRUS SOLUTION?

If
I took everything you said as absolute truth, it leaves a couple of RATIONAL possibilities.
1) Work with her but ensure all aspects are public and transparent as possible, exposing whatever underhandedness she did when she did it.
2) Repubs should never have insisted that she be the one in charge of the coronavirus solution in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: intangible child
Feb 2006
15,760
4,321
California
In a corporate world, this sort of behavior is juvenile.



I hate Pelosi and the sooner she leaves office the happier I will be.
But if we were to compare Pelosi to Trump, Trump is the one who is more untrustworthy.



THEN WHY DID REPUBS PUT HER IN CHARGE OF A CORONAVIRUS SOLUTION?

If
I took everything you said as absolute truth, it leaves a couple of RATIONAL possibilities.
1) Work with her but ensure all aspects are public and transparent as possible, exposing whatever underhandedness she did when she did it.
2) Repubs should never have insisted that she be the one in charge of the coronavirus solution in the first place.
Trump is taking drastic measures now!

 
Feb 2020
1,722
634
Houston
In a corporate world, this sort of behavior is juvenile.



I hate Pelosi and the sooner she leaves office the happier I will be.
But if we were to compare Pelosi to Trump, Trump is the one who is more untrustworthy.



THEN WHY DID REPUBS PUT HER IN CHARGE OF A CORONAVIRUS SOLUTION?
Because they suck, too.

If I took everything you said as absolute truth, it leaves a couple of RATIONAL possibilities.
1) Work with her but ensure all aspects are public and transparent as possible, exposing whatever underhandedness she did when she did it.
2) Repubs should never have insisted that she be the one in charge of the coronavirus solution in the first place.
But what an opportunity for her to show leadership.

The Republicans fumble, she picks up the ball and takes it to the goal line.

What's wrong with my idea that she originate a spending bill, which is her constitutional duty?