Voulez-vous coucher avec moi

Jun 2018
705
231
Toronto
#21
From where did you get the idea that Eve ate an apple if the 'apple' is not mentioned in The Holy Bible?

Alright, the 'forbidden fruit'. Eating it leads to knowledge about good and evil. That knowledge leads to shame of nakedness. And is punished by death.

Is that precise enough?
 
Dec 2018
781
10
U.S
#22
7489. ra'a'
afflict
A primitive root; properly, to spoil (literally, by breaking to pieces); figuratively, to make (or be) good for nothing, i.e. Bad (physically, socially or morally) -- afflict, associate selves (by mistake for ra'ah), break (down, in pieces), + displease, (be, bring, do) evil (doer, entreat, man), show self friendly (by mistake for ra'ah), do harm, (do) hurt, (behave self, deal) ill, X indeed, do mischief, punish, still, vex, (do) wicked (doer, -ly), be (deal, do) worse.


7462. ra'ah
break, companion, keep company with, devour, eat up, evil entreat
A primitive root; to tend a flock; i.e. Pasture it; intransitively, to graze (literally or figuratively); generally to rule; by extension, to associate with (as a friend) -- X break, companion, keep company with, devour, eat up, evil entreat, feed, use as a friend, make friendship with, herdman, keep (sheep)(-er), pastor, + shearing house, shepherd, wander, waste.



Being able to 'destroy'.
 
Dec 2018
781
10
U.S
#23
Alright, the 'forbidden fruit'. Eating it leads to knowledge about good and evil. That knowledge leads to shame of nakedness. And is punished by death.

Is that precise enough?
I would look at it more as:

eating led to knowledge of good and evil. That knowledge led to shame of nakedness. That knowledge led to 'authority' to save or destroy.

However, that 'authority' is not God ordained. It is a self willed, self wrought authority and only very temporary and by permission of The Higher Authorities.
 
Jun 2018
705
231
Toronto
#25
I would look at it more as:

eating led to knowledge of good and evil. That knowledge led to shame of nakedness. That knowledge led to 'authority' to save or destroy.
Yeah but you see the lesson here is knowing is bad, deciding what is good and what is evil is lethal. Better not even try to make judgements and decisions, leave it to authority or whoever is God's representative of the day.

Anyway, thanks for the response.
 
Dec 2018
781
10
U.S
#26
Yeah but you see the lesson here is knowing is bad, deciding what is good and what is evil is lethal. Better not even try to make judgements and decisions, leave it to authority or whoever is God's representative of the day.

Anyway, thanks for the response.
likewise.

And so since we have received of the knowledge of good and evil through Adam/Eve, God had to send His Only Begotten Son into the World so that through Him we might have clearer and better understanding and clearer and better knowledge. And, not only was/IS Christ (J)esus ordained of by God but Christ (J)esus is also ordained of by The LORD. And so I leave that 'Authority' where it is properly 'due', which is Christ (J)esus.

Fortunately, Christ (J)esus is for 'LIFE' and 'life' towards His Father and towards His God.

Amen and Amen.

That is why His and Theirs should be free to worship and praise without fear or reservation with the Fruit of The Spirit not being 'hindered' or 'lawed' against.


How is anyone to think or believe that they have the 'fruit of The Spirit' if they have not accepted The Spirit to begin with? Those that have are not too much in a hurry to break 'laws' of any sort, especially those 'laws' which are beneficial towards 'LIFE'.


There is a very important thing to keep in mind when you meet a person who is anti-God. To them, the possibility of them losing their monetary 'income' way(s) usually prevent them from acknowledging that God is Good. You rarely meet any person who earns 'rightful' income who is reluctant in/to acknowledging that God is Good. And many for this reason alone desire(s) 'death' over life.


It's not in the way(s) one spends 'rightful' income... it's in the way(s) that one earns 'income'. Illegal entities 'earn' their income through their 'customers' who spend their either 'rightful' income or their 'non rightful' income.


Skimping at work, skimping on taxes, etc... these are 'non rightful' earnings.


Taxes are on income 'earned'....

Let us use this as an example.

A person is on food stamps. However the food stamps department asks if that person gets/receives any outside 'contribution'. The person might. The person might receive outside 'contribution' because some other(s) are concerned for this person's living. With food stamps alone, this person can barely get by the month on 'foods', and for this reason an outside 'contributor' might have 'empathy/compassion' and help this person with outside contributions. However the food stamps department gets word of this and since the person might have left the outside contributions out of the application processes, and since the food stamps department 'found' that this person was not being 'legal' to the application, that the food stamps department cancelled this person's monthly food stamps allowance.

Although the 'income', the contributions, were not earned, the food stamps department considers this to be a fraud of non stated 'income'.

Why do I say this? Because of those in those 'higher places' which if they are going to lose their 'ways of income', then all others should be in the same 'legal' boat.


Did you know that Christmas gifts or any other sort of 'special gift(s)', such as birthday gifts also, are needed to be 'reported' into these sorts of Departments for 'deductive' purposes?



Let us say that there is a homeless person who is on 'food stamp' assistance but this person receives outside contribution from those passing by or even family members. If this homeless person does not report the outside 'contributions', even of 'foods' or/and of 'goods', they can be held responsible and accountable for 'skimping'. Even if the only thing given to them is 'grocery'.


Seems as if there are many 'disgruntled' workers that feel or think as if their 'job/work' is more of a 'curse' than a 'blessing'.


Needing to wake up and having to work to have/earn more than 3-5 times the amount that the 'welfare recipients' make/receive might seem 'unfair' to some...


Did you know that if a person who earns income but is under a certain income level desired to, they can have Housing Assistance to help 'pay' for a portion of their rent? The income level to be eligible for this is sometimes as high as 50 thousand or so, yearly. If you earn less than 50 thousand yearly, you could be eligible to receive housing assistance to have more disposable income to yourself.


So... taking a look at all the 'public' displays of aggravated attacks on rightful workers, in schools and in workplaces as well as on public roads and in public places. It does make me wonder why there is so much anti-work sentiments running around being validated and justified for an adult person not being able to claim for the same 'welfare' benefits or for 'working' without having the ability of not being overly disgruntled.


Because surely, if a worker is 'disgruntled' to the point of bringing others down, I'm sure he/she would qualify for 'welfare benefits' under some kind of 'disability'.


We can see the 'decay' of U.S culture in these very things to and by citizens living in the U.S.


I do not understand why some would advocate for the 'death to America/the United States' idea that many subscribe to.


First of all, America is not the United States alone just as the United States alone is not America in entirety and secondly, it would seem plausible to think/believe that it is/are these proponents which are bringing the U.S culture/life/traditions/values, etc... down from within the U.S.

Because why else would a person or persons seek to bring the U.S 'down'? For what reason?

There is speculation(s) of past wrong doing(s) etc... but to these hearts and minds, unless they have the full truth of the accusations to do such things, reconsideration(s) of the validity of their actions with their justifications should be dealt with first because more often than not, mistakes are within the reasons just like Church has the same 'mistake' possibility(ies) to/towards the Word of God.


I have heard that Native American Indians rode on horses to 'war' against the 'white man'. However, horses are/were not indigenous to U.S soil. They were brought 'over' from another place.
 
Last edited:
Jun 2018
705
231
Toronto
#27
Yeah but he is never around you know. So we are relegated to whoever manages to claim to be his representative at any given point.
 
Jun 2018
705
231
Toronto
#28
So... taking a look at all the 'public' displays of aggravated attacks on rightful workers, in schools and in workplaces as well as on public roads and in public places. It does make me wonder why there is so much anti-work sentiments running around being validated and justified for an adult person not being able to claim for the same 'welfare' benefits or for 'working' without being overly disgruntled.


Because surely, if a worker is 'disgruntled' to the point of bringing others down, I'm sure he/she would qualify for 'welfare benefits' under some kind of 'disability'.

I thought Jesus hated money and traders :)

I make 6 figures, admittedly canadian, do you think if I start going to church and put a serious prayer it will get even better?

:)
 
Dec 2018
781
10
U.S
#29
Introduced animals

Family: Bovidae (cattle, antelope, sheep, goats)
Family: Equidae (horses and allies)

List of mammals of the United States - Wikipedia



Order: Didelphimorphia (common opossums)
Order: Cingulata (armadillos)
Order: Rodentia (rodents)
Order: Lagomorpha (lagomorphs)
Order: Eulipotyphla (shrews, hedgehogs, moles, and solenodons)
Order: Chiroptera (bats)
Order: Carnivora (carnivorans)
Order: Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates)
Order: Proboscidea (elephants and allies)
Order: Sirenia (manatees and dugongs)
Order: Cetacea (whales)



These were not introduced....
 
Dec 2018
781
10
U.S
#30
I thought Jesus hated money and traders :)

I make 6 figures, admittedly canadian, do you think if I start going to church and put a serious prayer it will get even better?

:)
He doesn't hate money nor traders.

Traitors and traders are not synonymous nor is money and the love of money synonymous.


The only 'haters' among traitors/traders, money and lovers of money are themselves who don't care about 'wrong doing'.


So why the big deal on 'getting the world' correct?

I don't know.. maybe the youths/children can have a better answer....



What did YOU want when you were a youth/child? World corruption?

No?

Then do you think any other child or youth would?


Corruption is learned/grown into... It does not come with 'birth'.

And how difficult it is to grow out of 'bad habits', huh?


Proverbs 22:6 "Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.'


Train up a child to hate the U.S and when he/she is old, he/she will not depart from it.


Obviously, the ones training the child has been trained the same.


Since what year has the 'black' U.S citizens been 'trained' to hate or speak against the 'white' U.S when it was the 'white' U.S that abolished 'slavery'?

It must be either self learned/taught or only 1 or maybe 2 generations of 'training'.


The Haymarket affair (also known as the Haymarket massacre, Haymarket riot, or Haymarket Square riot) was the aftermath of a bombing that took place at a labor demonstration on May 4, 1886, at Haymarket Square in Chicago.[2] It began as a peaceful rally in support of workers striking for an eight-hour day and in reaction to the killing of several workers the previous day by the police. An unknown person threw a dynamite bomb at the police as they acted to disperse the public meeting. The bomb blast and ensuing gunfire resulted in the deaths of seven police officers and at least four civilians; dozens of others were wounded.

In the internationally publicized legal proceedings that followed, eight anarchists were convicted of conspiracy. The evidence was that one of the defendants may have built the bomb, but none of those on trial had thrown it.[3][4][5][6] Seven were sentenced to death and one to a term of 15 years in prison. The death sentences of two of the defendants were commuted by Illinois governor Richard J. Oglesby to terms of life in prison, and another committed suicide in jail rather than face the gallows. The other four were hanged on November 11, 1887. In 1893, Illinois's new governor, John Peter Altgeld, pardoned the remaining defendants and criticized the trial.

Haymarket affair - Wikipedia


premeditation....



August 21, 1863
Massacre/Plunder164 (+40)1
Lawrence, Kansas TerritoryLawrence massacre – Pro-Confederate guerrillas destroy Lawrence, Kansas due to its support of abolition and reputation as a holdout for pro-union militias.


March 1871
Mob violence~30unknown
Meridian, MississippiMeridian Race Riot of 1871 – A highly contentious trial regarding the persecution of Black freedmen by the Ku Klux Klan and subsequent retaliation by the freedmen led to a gunfight in the courtroom and the death of the presiding judge. The local Klansmen looked for the Black suspects they thought responsible, and when unable to find them began killing all freedmen of note in the town, some on the streets and others while in custody. At least one home and a church that was being used as a school were also burned down. Approximately thirty Black men were killed over three days before federal troops arrived to stop the killings.


April 13, 1873
Mass shooting, prisoner massacre105+ (+3)unknown
Colfax, LouisianaColfax massacre – Black freedmen defending a courthouse were massacred by 300 armed White Southern Democrats and Ku Klux Klan members who wanted to take political control of the town in what they referred to as a "struggle for White supremacy". Casualty reports varied from 62 to 153, with a military report at the time stating 81 Black men by name who had been killed with several dozen more secretly buried or disposed of in the river, along with three White men, for a total of "at least" 105 casualties.


Terrorism in the United States - Wikipedia


July 1859 – January 1860
Organized genocide283+ (+5)unknown
Mendocino County, CaliforniaMendocino War – Anti-Indian band of mercenaries known as the "Eel River Rangers" kill 283 Indians, as well as capturing 292, in 23 separate engagements meant to drive Indians out of Round Valley. Overall casualties may have been in excess of 600.

February 26–28, 1860
Mass shooting, stabbing, hatchets, clubs80+unknown
Indian Island (Humboldt Bay), California1860 Wiyot massacre – Motivated by anger at cattle-stealing and the aim of terrorizing and eliminating all Indians in the region, around 50–100 white settlers coordinated 12 attacks on women, children, and elder men in Wiyot villages in the Humboldt Bay area from February 26–28. The reported number of Indians killed in some of the attacks are 80-150+ (Indian Island), 40 (Eel River), 58 (South Beach), 35 (Eagle Prairie), while the death tolls from several attacks are unknown.




After these, very few U.S 'racial' 'killings'.
 
Last edited:

Similar Discussions