The Real System Is: "If You're So Smart, Why Haven't You Made the Rich Richer?"How about that the human race is now advancing more on intellect than brawn so a chemist is more apt to attract an intelligent mate rather than a figurative low IQ valley girl that is attracted to the jocks.
The hereditary plutocracy claims that Social Darwinism determines that its offspring is superior and should be backed up by Daddy's Money all their lives. Yet this same conceited class won't pay superior minds the same high allowance its sons get in college. Contradicting your delusion about the way America is heading, jocks do get the equivalent of a richkid's allowance: expensive food, expensive housing, and expensive entertainment (plus free tuition, which is not what should be focused on as the ultimate reward).
Why should a High IQ think an intelligent mate is superior any more than jocks would think an athletic girl is the best mate? Your analogy is unbalanced, unless you think Kardashian bimbos are athletic, which you don't.
Besides, a PhD is someone who didn't earn a living until he was 30 years old. Why should we respect anyone who has no respect for his own intelligence? If he did, he would have demanded the same allowance in college that his future employers' sons get. Second, your degrees are discredited because you didn't have to compete with real men, who wouldn't go to college because it is work without pay. Your achievements since then reflect on the talent you should have stood up for, not on your class-biased indentured-servitude education.