What's Going On: Explaining Ideologies

Aug 2019
164
88
Warwickshire UK
#53
Which I don't! And is why I had to challenge this God&Country REpublican nationalism that can only make sense inside an airtight bubble.
I’m not an American, or a Republican, or a nationalist and so far all I’ve had is googled third-party quotes and links. I’m awaiting something called debate in someone’s own words that consist of more than a one liner. :)
 
Aug 2019
164
88
Warwickshire UK
#54
Let’s explain something in simple terms. Many years ago there was something that was referred to as ‘common sense.’ This was before the days of political correctness and having to warn people that a packet of nuts contains … Nuts, or that a floor is slippery when wet. People just knew these things and took care not to vote for extremists because ‘common sense’ told them what would happen if they did.

The extremists also knew this and so went to great lengths to disguise themselves. Hillary, a former Alinsky anarchist became a Democrat and Bernie the radical Maoist became a socialist. The communists became progressives and Mr. Obama produced a whole book that never once mentioned his Marxist beliefs. Of course, he slipped up now and again with his references to spreading the wealth around and you didn’t build that on your own (which is classical Marxism), but generally he hid his beliefs well. Mr. Obama was a former community organizer, which is why he organized the minorities against the system and tradition so well. He also became very wealthy from doing so.

Using political correctness instead of common sense, these people between them were able to fool a whole generation. The problem with minority rule is that it also unleashed the crazies and as the intended chaos of the Obama years started to produce consequences, political correctness took the place of common sense. Illegal immigrants became undocumented citizens, free speech disagreement was seen as Nazi and what use were borders if all cultures were now equal?

The problem with minorities is that they also include the sub-cultures and Obama opened a Pandora’s Box. They’d always been there, but society had kept them on the fringes because common sense instinctively told society what would happen if they allowed the crazies and nut jobs to go mainstream. Obama purposely kicked over the stones they’d been hiding under, normalized them and they crawled out in their hundreds of thousands.

Untitled-1.png

Riots broke out. Homosexual behaviour began to be taught to children as a normal lifestyle choice. The borders opened and the third-world swarmed in. A massive rise in recreational drug use followed and the previous mass-shootings became common place … There’s a reason sub-cultures in every society remain a minority and it’s nothing to do with racism or Nazism. What you’re seeing now is entirely the result of Obama and the oddballs he surrounded himself with. It never occurred under Reagan or Bush, which is when you’d expect this to happen, it happened under the hard line left. It was intentional and although the majority of gullible millennials didn’t intentionally vote for this, it’s what those of us who do political science knew would happen.
 
Likes: coldjoint
Dec 2016
5,570
2,825
Canada
#57
I’ve not asked anyone to learn from me and if you don’t agree with what I write that’s fine by me. Part of my job was teaching social and political science for many years in a communist country,
IN a communist country, or in a former communist country, which had all of its state enterprizes and public utilities privatized and taken over by the handful of oligarchs who made themselves billionaires in the 90's?
which doesn’t mean I know it all, but it does mean I know Googled hard left indoctrinated nonsense when I read it. It also means that I’ve studied Marxism at post-graduate university level probably before you were born
So, that would mean you're somewhere in your 80's or 90's today?
and some of my previous managers were real communist political officers in the CCP,
CCP....meaning Chinese Communist Party? WERE Real etc. etc. ...meaning they aren't party members now? Even though the CCP still exists and exercises control of politics and government! Does this mean they are critical of the Party now...but suffer no consequences?
not an indoctrinated generation with soft empty heads. Do I know what Marxism or Maoism is? Yes, I’ve lived under it.
Corporations, billionaires and a capitalist economy aside, the Communist Party still rules China, and that means they cannot veer too far from Mao's path, right Mr. Warden? If that is your real name![/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
Aug 2019
164
88
Warwickshire UK
#58
IN a communist country, or in a former communist country, which had all of its state enterprizes and public utilities privatized and taken over by the handful of oligarchs who made themselves billionaires in the 90's?

So, that would mean you're somewhere in your 80's or 90's today?

CCP....meaning Chinese Communist Party? WERE Real etc. etc. ...meaning they aren't party members now? Even though the CCP still exists and exercises control of politics and government! Does this mean they are critical of the Party now...but suffer no consequences?

Corporations, billionaires and a capitalist economy aside, the Communist Party still rules China, and that means they cannot veer too far from Mao's path, right Mr. Warden? If that is your real name!
[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

Naughty, naughty. If I want to tell you who I am or give out personal details I’ll let you know. :) (My name is not Warden).
 
Likes: coldjoint
Aug 2019
164
88
Warwickshire UK
#59
People will not accept the fact Obama became president to destroy the country, not lead it. Our freedom stands in the way of "progress."
Yes, previously the left used the working class to engineer a revolution with all the barricades and flags, but it didn’t work. They simply switched to minorities and gradually took over the institutions. Masquerading as a returning Messiah and using political terms he enabled the cultural Marxist ‘quiet revolution’ or ‘The slow march through the institutions’ to achieve his aims.

People often say that Obama was useless, but in fact he achieved exactly what he wanted. Obama promised to heal America, to unite it and gathered to him the most radical leftists in American history. What he was careful not to mention is that he wanted to change society itself. He caused the biggest divide since the civil war and set the minorities and sub-cultures at war with traditional values. The results of which you’re seeing now.

Moving on from Obama, Clinton would have carried that on and slowly introduced progressivism (authoritarianism), which was always the underlying aim.

Even now years later, some still don’t recognize how easily the left took over the institutions such as education or the media. How they normalized sexual deviances and promoted recreational drug use, opened the borders and let loose the leftist foot soldiers of Antifa and BLM. Even Pravda was warning America about Obama. They’d already been down that road and knew what would happen. Obama’s power of persuasion was so great, especially on the millennial generation, that some still think the results of the Obama years are a 60s right wing plot.
 
Aug 2019
164
88
Warwickshire UK
#60
For those who still don’t understand what cultural Marxism is and the effects on society during the Obama years, or have been so indoctrinated that they refuse to believe it, let’s offer a simple explanation.

Previously, if you wanted to change society you had to convince people first. If that happened there followed a violent overthrow of the existing order, either by a revolution, a coup or assassination. The problem now is, what happens if the majority won’t support you and the answer is to divert 180 degrees and change the people before society. Out with the workers and in with the minorities and change the existing order by taking over the institutions.

When you saw the BLM riots, the Antifa violence, the leftist takeover of campuses and mass third-world cultural immigration, what you were seeing is cultural Marxism at work. It was no secret and the voters were left to work out what was meant by Obama’s change, which they should have done by looking into Obama’s background. Change you can believe in’ was the clue. To be fair to Obama, he’d already hinted at what he was going to do, so it shouldn’t have come as a big surprise.

The idea behind cultural Marxism is to cause so much chaos in society that eventually the majority will demand authoritarianism to sort out the resulting mess and voluntarily vote in a progressive government. It’s what it was designed for. Cultural Marxism then is what comes before progressivism; political correctness stifles dissent and combined this enables the introduction of authoritarianism without the previous barricades, or the need to convince the majority.

It really is quite straightforward, it’s not an opinion and there is no right wing conspiracy about it. The current hard line Democratic left make no secret that they’re progressive, they’re telling you they’re authoritarian, just as Obama told you he was going to change society. ‘Yes we can?’ Yes he did.
 

Similar Discussions